The influence that politics has in society and peoples
Introduction
Society as such, is built through individuals through the different organizations they carry out with the objective of being able to live in a hierarchical environment, as well as allow the due functioning of social dynamics, through this every human beingExecute a role in different areas of everyday life, as at the family, work, educational level and even in interpersonal relationships, where it has a lot to do with people’s behavior to be able to carry out an effective environment.
On the other hand, if we talk about the people in more specific terms, this refers to the set of people from a certain country, or region, which therefore possess many characteristics to be considered as that, however, they need a configuration thatIt allows them to stand out in the social sphere, thus forming a society with direct and precise principles capable of defending the feeling of identity and nationality anywhere in the world.
In the same way, there are the policies that are clearly key in our humanity, because, although they are used in companies, and in most cases at the governmental level, these are those that stipulate the actions of corporations, byConsequently, that can bring both negative and positive effects, and in turn allows social life to be shaped in all its splendor.
Starting from the aforementioned, this essay is intendedthat politics is a fundamental axis for movement in our social environment.
Developing
At the end of the last century, a series of peaceful revolutions shook central and east Europe in the name of civil society. The terms of Oscanske, Civil, Grzhdanskore, Abywatelski, which can be translated as civil or civic were associated with that of "society" and together they acquired a keyword to understand the historical moment of different nations of that part of Europe, and served as a sloganto mobilize them with a view to a deep transformation of their political regime, their economic order and, in general, their social system. In addition, it can be affirmed that, therefore, that the idea of civil society arose at the time in many parts of the world. It was an response to some extent spontaneous in a historical situation. To get out of it, dissidents only saw one way: they should develop their own initiative, their organization and above all, they had to achieve a self-organized society as much as possible (Barlinska, 2006, pp.20-22).
The State or Political Society, through the Pact or Social Contract, is the antithesis of this condition, the sovereign personifies the maximum artificial homo, but avoids consequences of war. With Ferguson and the most expressive political economy of bourgeois liberalism, civil society will no longer equip the barbarian or spontaneous, but as the new commercial nations show, to the civilized (Polyhed). But this Bourgeois Society, like Hobbes and its semblance of the Laws of Nature in society, is not yet the State State or Society: Civilitas is not the Civitas. It is an independent condition, although practically precedes it (Bilbeny, 2008, p.42).
We consider that historical facts have a lot to do in the sense of the subsequent development of society in all its extension, since it practically comes from central Europe, then as the years pass extend throughout Latin America, and even arrivingTo other continents, this is extremely essentialTo a firm society with its different items that make it.
The conditions of the mass society allow the establishment of interaction structures between the elites and the groups that do not constitute elites, the characteristic elements of this structure being the degree of accessibility of the first to the latter and the availability of the seconds to bemobilized by the first. The structure of the mass society, characterized by the weakness of intermediate relationships, the isolation of personal relationships and the centralization of national relationships, contributes to a high probability of mass behavior (Tejerina, 2010, P.9).
A people can be configured as a nation to the extent that its historical existence as a community allows you to generate their own cultural integration links that transcend the limited framework of political and economic relations. Similarly, national reality is not a situation that is accessed and that guarantees indefinitely, social integration among its members. On the contrary, as due to a slow process of cultural integration, the transformation of a town into national community can be achieved, it can also be generated through a process of disintegration or loss of own cultural identity, the transformation of a nation into aPopular collectivity. In reality, such transition processes between both forms of social grouping (peoples and nations) are the ones that dominate the panorama of the internal social structures and the foreign relations of the states, and in these processes of management and alteration of the societies affect, very particularly, not only the transformations experienced by the political forces or the production factors of such societies, but also the modifications experienced in the dominant ideologies and values in them (Calduch, 1991, pp.23-24).
It is evident that society in masses is one that fulfills an influential role in a state, and with this the elites are reflected in its integrity, as these are established in the world, without leaving aside the groups that do not make up the elites , it is there that we can differentiate it, so to speak, people with “high, medium or low social class”, this is more in the basis of the goods that human beings acquire, from the previous centuries that are delimited to the “bourgeoisie "And" proletariat "both social biases that in one way or another alter our coexistence; On the other hand, there is talk of the people, it should be noted that this is undoubted same way, the fact that they are the primary axis at the time of the electoral elections, "people" term that can be seen for many as something limited, should also be seen that they are what dominate our current system.
The problem of political and politics is linked to Marx, Engels and Lenin, with the problem of history. Indeed, the Marxist position in this regard depends on the two fundamental propositions of Marx and Engels in the communist manifesto according to which: a) All class struggle is a political struggle and b) The class struggle is the engine of history. Being Marxism for historicism a genetic science of becoming in general, and the policy being the engine of history, in the last analysis a science of politics and even "a science of the revolution" would be identified with the simple unilineal becoming (Pulantzas, 2001, P.3. 4).
In politics, the relationship between the State and civil society, that is, an intervention of the State (centralized will) to educate the educator, the social environment in general (deepen and plan it with more exact terms) (Gramsci, 1992: 276).
While policies, they cooperate with the fact of extracting all possible rules to apply for them in a company, they also need leaders who are able to regulate all kinds of operations for it, together choose a good work team that has allThe possible and competent capabilities to carry the reins of this corporation, with no way to this, it would not be viable to guarantee or strengthen policies in any space, therefore we see that society, the people and policies keep a close relationship with thePolitics for the reasons supported, apart from the fact that the human being is a political animal because he plays his keys for his direct interest, both individually and collectively.
Consequently, society has too many dynamics so that marche in the most profitable way, although the system is required in such a way, it is required that all human beings assume a less retrograde mentality, for that reason the policy is related toThe company, since the mandate or the degree of power that the government can enjoy on citizens is tested, is at this point where both the government apparatus requires the citizen to take possession in an electoral contest andachieve everyone’s power, as well as the electorate asks the attention of the government in particular at the moment when he wishes to make his basic demands.
In short, the people are the basis of the democratic regime, which means that they are the ones that dictate the fate of a nation, because they are dedicated to production in high ranges and with this we refer to the economy, health, education;Regardless of social class, gender, race, religion, but an entire sector of society, although they have a complex derivation since they are the center of everything, this set of social beings lead us to a construction of a more just community,Where rights prevail and inequalities are reduced, therefore there is a quantitative advance in our general circle.
In a nutshell, policies will always exist in an institution of any kind, and the people who comprise them must have a total commitment, comply with orders, to generate an environment full of peace and positivism.
conclusion
Finally, all the concepts raised: (Society, people and policies) are the sum of the historical reconstruction that has been displayed from our ancestors, which already assumed a standard of modus liventi without so much complication, it was only a well -established routineof moral and ethical principles, although in most cases an authority was needed to be directed by the direction of its own nation, without excepting the benefit at all costs of their interests;Thus we notice that politics is a natural movement and that it is present in any sphere of daily life.
Leave feedback