The Civil War in Syria
Introduction
In the 8 years that it has been war in Syria, they have destroyed a good part of the main cities, has left more than 370 thousand dead, which has resulted in the forced migration of more than half of its inhabitants in addition to5.6 million exiles. The government has used war as an urban planning excuse. The war in Syria has bombard.
Developing
Not rehabilitating what was destroyed, but destroying everything to replace it with something completeconcept. It seems that it is true, since the Syrian government took advantage of the expulsion of its population to renew the quality of inhabitants, to the consideration of Zein having upper class inhabitants decreases the possibility of challenging the government.
Russia and Iran distribute natural resources while China and the United States in addition to Gulf States are willing to invest, on the other hand, the European Union claims a political solution to participate in the reconstruction of the country. Europe is seen as a contradictory country, while putting its president to Asad as a work to contribute with Syria, with Palestine there was no impediment. Syria requires 250 billion dollars to restore economy and infrastructure.
Under that premise the government has given free via to local authorities to create public-private investment companies in charge of financing reconstruction projects. There are 2 examples of this support by the Syrian government for reconstruction, the first is MarotOffice buildings, shopping centers and up to 12 thousand luxury homes.
While the second is Basilya City with more than 4,000 homes outside of it and Homs or Aleppo are planned to continue with this reconstruction model. The former expropriated residents will be replaced by more well -off -class people. At the same time, reconstruction is being carried out in specific places where there was already a previous economic development, while other depressed areas are left aside. It seems that the inequality gaps in Syria,
Rather than disappear by war they will intensify later. A clear mirror can be Lebanon, this during its civil war originated by lack of public funds and need to break the sectorization, who was in charge of reconstruction delegated responsibilities leaving the arrangement in the hands of a private company. This company named Solere had mostly an action, who promised to return the lost glory in the capital.
conclusion
While some see it as the starting point of the country’s rebirth, for others it personifies serious evils such as clientelism and corruption. Another stage of what happened with the deconstruction is that 87% of the area was demolished, more than the war had caused, until this point it sounds similar to what is happening with Syria, the privatization of reconstruction, nepotism, nepotism,Among other situations, here is why it is considered a mirror.
Leave feedback