Test on the ethical dilemma of Wikileaks
The present research work is based on the ethical dilemma of Wikileaks in which the moral and ethical substance was repealed. The document focused on the key aspects of the ethical dilemma and what are the serious consequences of the same. Ethics implies knowing the difference between what you have the right to do and what is correct to do (Potter Stewart). The appointment explains the position of ethics in the life of an individual. Explain what a person should do and to what extent it is correct to do it. The individual in his life must always differentiate his actions with the degree of righteousness in it. The individual must have a sense of knowledge if this activity is doing in the right way or not. For a professional it is not mandatory that what I have done is the right thing. There may be situations in which a professional may be trying to do something wrong and for that situation an ethical dilemma will be presented, either to follow the orders of the will to complete the tasks or if it is ethical and judge the situations from the pointof others. watch.
This is true that every time we look for ethical situations, it is important to put yourself in the place of the common person or the person on the other side and then act. This always explains whether the same actions carried out by others will cause the same result as we are doing. Julian Assange, the founder of Wikileaks, launched the website in 2006 in Iceland;Assange had three friends / colleagues, Kristinn Hrafsson, Joseph Farrell and Sarah Harrison, along with her. Harfsson, who was also related to Sunshine’s production, was carrying out the business.
With a force of around 800 reporters without payment, the company operates as a non -profit organization worldwide. The company is involved in the publication of secret news and information to the public of the nation. The reason for the same is that the public must be aware of what is happening in their country and what the government is trying to do for people really. Wikileaks has affected government rights in a good way. The company shows a transparency of the news to the public because the government is hindered in support form.
Some people read the truth and news about the government leave support for voting rights and are against the government. In the essay, we will discuss with certain examples how the votes of the government and the legality of Wiki leaks are affected from the point of view of the government and what is the general impact.
The news and transparency of the Wiki leaks damage the government and support, since it is seen that in Kenya during the 2007 elections, the Wiki leaks presented a government fraud of $ 3,000,000, where the scam resulted in aIncreased malaria disease that resulted in 20% of deaths of children under 5 years and after the scam was exposed, the news had turned around 10% of the votes against the government.
The two issues involved are: they must have adequate and unbridled information about what governments are trying to do. Information that is a clear part of government business must be properly protected to allow discussion and help in appropriate and correct judgments.
There is a certain exception where, just considering that the government is trying to do a secret project and someone from the wiki escape discovers the same, and the project is such that it can cause some significant losses of lives. Therefore, this information shared with the public must be totally defensible, since it may also be possible that it is an important operation and that the informant has not obtained all the information.
As for the publication of information, several lives can save, but if there has been no whistle or how no damage has been avoided. And the information has really been created and arranged in such a way against the public for the government. Or even in a more unfavorable consideration, the operation or project was actually such that it put a strategic operation to save certain lives of people and information could be a compromised leak and could even counterattack. In this way, this does a lot of damage to the government and it might not be healthy. Therefore, Wiki leaks must work in a more refined way or together with the government so that support for both is equally mutual.
Leave feedback