Studying the so considered urban art or vandalism
Throughout its existence, the human being sought any method to express their feelings and emotions through any method, currently one of these forms is called urban art, but is it really an art or just another way to vandalize and ruin the image ofa city?
Our world has always been full of those simple brands and one of the ways in which it was expressed was to make vindictive painted on the walls. Since in some media it was tolerant with those graffiti, the thing derived on the one hand in making drawings and mega letters with a certain artistic sense, which was called graffiti, but also in dirtying the walls with signs, symbols, signatures and signatures andscribbles, with a clear non -artistic expression but vandalism.
A wave of urban art enriches our cities. This fascinating creativity of urban graffiti combines styles of classical painting, realism, abstraction and surrealism, using the most street tools: roller and spray. Grafiti is a diverse, constructive and vandalic cultural movement at the same time. This has two faces, that of the sublime expression of academic canons and that of the apparent cultural resistance to the system.
But urban art is not the same as vandalism. Vandalism is not art, it makes no sense, it has no beauty, it is a form of violence without social communication. There are vandalism that the only thing they do is destroy the urban area, making the city more unpleasant.
The urban art graffiti should not be confused with the category of typographic graffiti and much less with vandalism, whose claim is to maintain organized graphic chaos. In recent years, metropolitan graffiti artists are much more territorial and aggressive. Although it is true that the revaluation of artistic graffiti represents a rescue of the meaning of the street as a place of communicative exchange, not everything is worth in the space of all. Clayed crystals with sharp objects have become an expression of repudiable art-vandalic, also illegible typographic screams in commercial doors.
With all this we are clear that vandalism and urban art are two very different things and this difference is given by what the artist wants to express, if he claims something to society or paints relevant facts of interest, art is considered, but if he does withoutNo meaning would be vandalism.
Leave feedback