Share capital in local development
During the last 15 years the developing world and in particular for the analysis we are developing in the municipality of Popayán, they have experienced a wide range of policy and reform styles in search of the acceleration of economic growth, poverty reduction and maintainDemocratic governance. To achieve these Popayán and much of the world objectives, they have adopted by the policies framed in the economy, to deal with the reduction of the benefit rate after economic crises where issues such as, the defense of property rights, stability are seenmacroeconomic, impulse to the free market and commercial integration. However, the results that we have been able to evidence were not exactly the most anticipated, although in many cases the measures responded to orientations of equal inspiration, but that is where inspiration is not the only thing that is enough for this type of development for successFrom the measures and quality of public policies, it is seen in the good management and capacity of those who direct and focus on corresponding to the management of each of the factors to follow without corruption and immoralities that day to dayday they affect and pollute democracy and this type of social and cultural economic development that since then they have not been uniform. Hence, in the field of development you wonder, because while some countries or regions can adapt their policies quickly to changes in external circumstances or innovate when policies do not give results, other areas, react slowly and with great difficulties, or maintaininadequate measures for long periods of time.
However, having minimal agreements is essential to make sense of economic research and examine some of the elements that explain the sources of distortion in the markets, and prevent the optimal use of resources for the achievement of well -being by triggering important regional differences, such asthat are observed in the development of the department of Cauca and especially in the municipality of Popayán. The problem until now, is that despite phenomena, social cohesion such as the one that has held indigenous mobilization, unconformities stops as education, health and citizen welfare, the renowned levels of financial savings, the degree of articulation of articulation ofpolitical elites to the national decision center and the presence of some comparative advantages associated with the availability of natural resources;The department does not report privilege levels in the context of regional and national development. Something seems to be happening, with civil society cooperation networks, which suggests the existence of the existence, of the social organization capable of generating synergies in the formulation and implementation of development policies (positive social capital) and anotherpart that maintains slow characteristics.
The continuous insistence of the need to appropriate a framework for political stability, where public policies work, by the propellars of the change of development model in Popayán, the social-capital society and social social society and political democracy relationship has made much closer. All by virtue that if the social organization is capable of becoming deliberative cells (Hernández et al, 2001; Alcántara, 2005), the confidence that springs from human interaction under auto -set restrictions (norms) makes the commitment borncivic and political participation is dynamic, which has relevant consequences in the distribution and legitimacy of the exercise of public power.
Thus, if the share capital is unequally distributed or the decision -making mechanism within organizations is too autocratic, to the point that they accumulate in those who need it less, fractures are generated for the stability of the political system thatThey prevent the good course of collective action, which is why a good choice of our rulers is necessary, those that generate specific and non -crazy strategies that generate imbalance.
Leave feedback