Reflective analysis of the dollhouse
Introduction.
In the work "Casa de Dolls", by author Henrik Ibsen, we can visualize how Pandora’s box opens leaving the role of women within a patriarchal society of the nineteenth century. The author of the present work, through the main character, Nora, illustrates the role of a European mother without rights, who only occupied the function of obeying and pleases her husband. However, Nora decides to start living under her own terms and breaking the Model Wife Mold in search of her independence.
He is considered the most important Norwegian playwright and one of the authors who have most influenced modern dramaturgy, father of modern realistic drama and a history of symbolic theater. At the discretion of this author, this work is a clear example of social and moral criticism towards society and its injustices. In this case, the writer of the work focuses on the situation of women, where to understand the severity of immoralities it is put in women’s shoes.
Nora looks totally chained to a marriage without a future where she acts like a doll, just smiling and adorning the dominant figure of her husband. I think that this is an indisputable evidence of the machismo of that time, since Nora should always obey her husband’s requests, Helmer, who in addition to being a manipulative man, could also relate count on a complex of God, believing himself with the ability todo what you want without facing the consequences.
Based on these two characters, I realized that both are only some victims of machismo present in the entity of the nineteenth century, Nora in greater proportion for the abuses lived, and their spouse in the sense that I could appreciate how he grew up believing thatIt must be the person above others and not which is solidarity with the rest.
In conclusion I can say that Nora’s release from the cage which she called home is one of the most excellent representations of feminism. In a matter of that she begins to rethink absolutely everything, from the raising of her father to her desire to be a mother, this fact seems fascinating since in search of her freedom, it ceases to be a doll thus becoming a woman owned by herdestiny.
Developing.
The work "Casa de Muñecas" published in 1979 is only a small part of the problem representing sexist attitudes and patriarchy. This revolutionary work is one of the master pieces of the renowned writer Henrik Ibsen, who was responsible for representing the women of the nineteenth century very real way. This was achieved by the life of a young European named Nora, who chained to her marriage, realizes that the house she called home was actually a cage where her jailer was her own husband, Helmer, this fact will generate several valuesand antivalores within the drama ranging from the most complex, such as love;Even the most rebellious, as is disobedience.
The type of characters that are presented were so flat that sometimes the changes were not seen with the naked eye. Based on this statement, the following question is answered. Patriarchy: Patriarchate is called the predominance of authority that a male exerts on a group of people or society, specifically about women and children. Nora is a clear example of a woman without rights that exceeds all difficulties in search of her freedom.
The society of that time and the current one is wrapped in machismo, to such an extreme that we can say is a silent monster personified by the loved ones of many women who die little by little in solitude physically and mentally. This is what happens in the writing "Doll House" where we evidence how the way in which the author writes the characters and their attitudes is so realistic that it seems that the patriarchy comes alive and becomes frequent characters of the plotHelmer and Krogstad names.
These will be responsible for delaying the evolution of the main character in a transcendental way, since, it is not, until the end of the drama where we see how everything makes sense and our main character decides to break the silence and get up against its oppressors obtaining obtainingHis freedom and independence. The woman for a long time was so devalued that her homes became prisons, since we see how her role is very similar to that of a doll whose objective is to decorate the masculinity of her husband, who despised the work of her fiancethe upbringing that was giving their children.
This is nothing more than a demonstration of the current situation that many women live, in which the abandonment of a father towards his children is normalized, but the desire not to be a woman’s mother is condemned. It is for this reason that he considers this fundamental part of the knowledge of all people without exception, since no one is exempt from falling into the claws of the patriarchal system either as victims or perpetrators. Author Henrik Ibsen is one of the most recognized for expressing the rawness of injustices through situations so realistic that they seem counted by a person with an honest and suffered life.
This is how this theatrical work is no exception, since the simple fact of belonging to the second stage of the literary style of IBSEN called ‘social criticism and ethical posture’ already makes it a master and key to future generations, because not onlyIt is a criticism, but to mark a precedent in the western scene, where all the abuses suffered by the most vulnerable people would begin to be exposed.
As for the objective of “dollhouse” it can be said that it was to seek the approach to individuals and society to know their conditions, because in the middle of the industrial revolution the clergy and the bourgeoisie would obtain more power than before, leaving thethose lagging to be victims of a system with the sole objective of ensuring the safety of those who represent an investment.
There is no barrier, lock, or bolt that you can impose on the freedom of my mind. In this appointment we can see how the author expresses that although a person is enclosed, his mind can be controlled. This is the case of Nora in the study work, because we see how throughout history Nora tries to be independent of her husband, however this is not possible until the end of the tragedy.
A clear example of the exposed fact is when our main character tries to request a proto. It is here where the patriarchy is once again establishes a relationship based on the dependency between a woman and her eposo. Currently this relationship has changed remarkably,
Among the values present in this writing we appreciate how love and loyalty stand out. The love that Nora felt towards Helmer burned with such intensity that she came to hurt her, we see this when she was even able to go to jail as long as her husband is still free and economically helps her children, this is how we can say this, it was a love that scratched the sickly. Based on the previous affirmation, the areas of knowledge that last throughout history can be related.
One of them were the human sciences focused on the branch of psychology, since there is a risk where all more pure love is to become sick in the appropriate circumstances. Another of the values found in the work is loyalty, but in this case it is a blind loyalty, which harmed Nora in a great way.
The most notorious antivalor in this drama is disobedience, however, this was extremely justified and necessary. Based on the fact that Nora were blinded by what is ruled by society leaving her without their own criteria, however, in the end he decidedending with the questioning of his true desire to be a mother. This type of rebellion is which every woman in the same circumstances of Nora should have, since only they must be owners of their destinations without needing the dependence of anyone.
Clearly established the values and antivalores we can observe how the author throughout the work juice a lot with the perception of the morality of the readers, since we were presented to disobedience as something good and to excessive love as something sick . The characters lose their identity as the work takes place reaching an unrecognizable personality. This is the case of the two main characters Nora and Helmer, being the first most important and demonstrating the most surprising change, since at the beginning it was only seen as a woman with the sole purpose of serving and worshiping her husband, however,That ended up leaving an unnecessary bonds and sacrifices.
In the case of Helmer, the situation is quite admirable, because we see a change of 180 degrees where in the end it is willing to change for the only condition that its marriage does not end, however, Nora’s decision was already taken andThere was no going back. In this part we can see how the area of reason prevails over feelings, leading Nora to do what she knew was the right thing for herself stopping thinking about others and putting themselves as a priority. One of the most seen forms of knowledge is language as a method of expression over violence or gestures, this helps the reader’s clear understanding when reading the work.
conclusion.
In conclusion, it only remains to say why this work is a masterful example of revolution and overcoming. And it makes it clear that all the women who have read and read this book are much more than wives, friends, mothers and sisters. Over all these things they are independent women capable of choosing themselves over the others and not simple dolls or princesses enclosed waiting for a prince, to be used as an ornament of the masculinity of a man.
Leave feedback