Quality Management at the Autonomous University Corporation of Nariño
Introduction
The COPASST plays a very important role within all companies, since it is responsible for the promotion and surveillance of the rules and regulations of (SGSST), this guarantees that the risks of occupational diseases and work accidents are reduced to a minimum,and it is called paritar.
Developing.
The employer is obliged to define and assign the financial, technical resources and provide the necessary personnel to carry out the implementation, review, evaluation and improvement of prevention and control measures, in addition to everything necessary for the Joint Committee or VigíaSecurity fulfill your mission. The employer must adopt the necessary measures for workers and their representatives to the committee or vigía, participate in the execution of security policies. The ARL must train the joint committee or vigía in it and provide the necessary advice and assistance.
It is an agency for the promotion and surveillance of the norms and regulations of safety and health at work within a company, it does not come to replace the prevention and promotion actions in occupational health and health. Nor will it assume responsibilities that, in prevention and control of accidents, occupational diseases, identification, evaluation and risk control, have the different high controls of the company. As you should also propose impact and health impact activities, recommend preventive or corrective measures to maximize incidents,
Resolution 1016 of 1989, which regulates the organization, operation and form of occupational health programs that employers or employers must develop in the country. Decree 1295 of 1994 determines the organization and administration of the General System of Professional Risks, the period of validity of its members increases 2 years. Establishes the obligation of the employer to grant at least 4 hours a week to each of its members for the activities of the committee.
Changes that introduced Law 1562 of 2012
This brought new concepts in the Safety and Work System at Work Management and Health System at work the concept of work accidents are extended. Clarifies the need to evaluate the Table of occupational diseases every 3 years. There is a new composition and nature of the disability qualification joints. Risk system guarantee.
New concepts in the system
The word professionals is changed to work and the definition of the system is maintained as the set of public and private entities, norms and procedures, destined to prevent, protect and attend to workers from the effects of diseases and accidents that may occur with them withoccasion or consequences of the work carried out by Special Commission.
SECURITY AND HEALTH AT WORK
Before it was understood as a simple set of activities in industrial hygiene, security and preventive medicine that proceeded to maintain and ensure the individual and collective health of workers. With the new law, occupational health should be understood as safety and health at work, a true discipline on the prevention of injuries and diseases that can occur to workers due to working conditions.
Management and health system at work.
Before employers had to have an occupational health program, which was the simple organization and planning of occupational health activities. The law currently assigns the employer the obligation to implement a management and health management system at work, understood as a logical process and in stages that follow the directives of the International Labor Organization regarding the policy, the organization, theplanning, application, evaluation, auditing and improvement actions.
What is occupational risk prevention?
It is the discipline that seeks to promote the improvement of health and safety of workers at work through the application of measures and the development of the necessary activities to prevent risks derived from work conditions, having as a fundamental tool the evaluation of developed riskIn each company by technicians specialists in occupational risk prevention.
How is occupational risk prevention?
It is achieved by giving adequate information and training to the workers communicating specific risks of the workplace before their incorporation of the job preventing and protecting the safety and health of the worker.
What is achieved with this work?
With this work, it is known and publicize the importance of Copasst and prevention brigades either in a public or private company which allows us to know the knowledge of prevention and risk activities, which whose objective is to minimizeabnormal emergencies or eventualities at the workplace improving the safety and health of workers.
Conclusions
It is concluded that Copasst is a committee responsible for the promotion and surveillance of standards in health and safety issues at work within public and private companies, which is designed for the well -being of both the employer and the worker.On the other hand, we say that the brigades are people who work in the entity and that voluntarily register to collaborate in emergency situations (they receive the corresponding inductions for each of the scenarios that may arise, their main objective is the well -being ofPeople who are in the entity).
Bibliography.
- Unigraría La U Green of Colombia (2019)
- Republic of Colombia. Ministry of Labor and Social Security. Decree 1295 of 1994, which determines the organization and administration of the General System of Professional Risk. Official Gazette n.º 41.405.
- Republic of Colombia. Ministry of Labor. Decree 1072 of 2015, through which the Single Regulatory Decree of the Labor Sector is issued. Official Gazette n.or 49.523.
- Garcia r. Usefulness of the integration and convergence of qualitative and quantitative methods in health research. Rev. Cuban Public Health. 2010;36 (1): 19-29
- Marqués FM. Health promotion: an element of business competitiveness [editorial]. Prevention Archive Occupational Risk. 2014 Oct;17 (4): 185 Schmal R, Ruiz-Tagle A. A model for the management of a university school oriented to competency -based training. Fut adm. 2009;22 (39): 287-305
Leave feedback