President López Obrador
Introduction
President López Obrador declared a few days ago that the neoliberal system had collapsed thanks to Coronavirus. When breaking down, the president thought that public opinion, the media and the opposition could surprise. Nothing he proposed on April 5 was amazing. Not as the president tried to say will surely replicate his model in other countries. We will not be hurrying our comments, Mr. President? Are we correctly reading reality? I suppose that at this time in the National Palace there are a number of speeches that prevent the president from clearly seeing what happens in other countries.
Developing
The coronavirus prevention strategy, until now, has been effective, in reality, we do not know what the reaction of the people will be when the deaths begin to seem in each of the communities, in each of the municipalities and statesof our country. The "good people", "the happy people" will stop being at some point. Not for an ideological cause but for an uncontrollable circumstance as the end of life. The plague could reach the federal government in an unsuspected way, Mr. President. We have not yet faced fatality, even the indices favor this government and give it maneuvering possibilities.
It would seem dishonorable to talk about luminous future times in an instant where the night is not yet. And if we wait a couple of weeks to look at phase three of contingency by Coronavirus and see how international markets react. Because there is no good news when the dollar begins to ascend excessively and reaches 26 pesos. It must be remembered that the average Mexican has an dependency, a philia, perhaps with consumption;Even the highest classes do not even believe Mexicans, if they have not adopted a series of customs of the North American mediero class that lives in the suburbs as an identity system. Yes, that’s the mentality.
Even many of the opposition politicians. Mexicans, unfortunately, do not adopt internal patterns of ways of living or behaviors, if we do not simply love everything that is impossible for us to achieve. That is why it is so easy to make a criticism of a government that does not understand part of the collective ideology and, much less, is fully prepared for the biblical scenario of death in each of the houses, in each of the villages,In each of the regions. The president claims to be optimistic. Now we do not need optimism, we need the leader to show us output alternatives before a catastrophic scenario that approaches as soon as we reach phase three of the pandemic.
Numbers and death incidents will get worse when growing excessively. That is a possible scenario, Mr. President. It is something that approaches us, having already exceeded the infection numbers to two thousands and hundreds in deaths. He has not collapsed the neoliberal system, they are collapating the forms of government and then, they will be structured. I fear telling him that, despite his material detachment and his abandonment of material goods, reality awaits us out there to face our political theories, Mr. President.
The philosophy you profess is not collective philosophy. I do not know some things, classes do not occur in the government halls as the PRI did. Speeches like this come from a golden age of Mexican cinema where the common citizen was idealized and an identity created by the celluloid was professed. I recreate their words: “How to give money to the poor, how to support the poor who work if they are loose. If they are poor, they don’t work. It is a retrograde thought, the poor work a lot what happens is that they work and work and work and do not go ahead, because they have no opportunities do not value their work ”.
conclusion
The emotional virulence of these words has been the strategic error of many years ago of a PRI that built a nationalism of cinematographic fiction. We need an accurate diagnosis where the poor is not good to exist, but for their habits. The political system in this explanation depends on an ecosystem of good and bad. I fear telling him that he is not so simple, living conditions do not determine man. And goodness does not necessarily live in the poor. We need a statesman to look at reality and diagnose reality above Mexican gold cinema scenes.
Leave feedback