Personal circumstances and our strengths
About how will the knowledge that we give, this degree of which people receive our knowledge is known as “cognitive capacity” which makes the person seriously take our knowledge, only if we are peopleIntelligent for which people judge without knowing, this is dependent on the time, for example, if a low -income person seeksexcel, and these may not realize that this person could be super-given in the field of knowledge, so he will make more relevant when taking this knowledge.
Thus, emphasizing "the cognitive ability" usually makes it of the utmost importance, since as we see in the example, it usually makes stereotypes influence this, another very clear example is that of the scientist who arguments and discovered relativity (Albert Einstein), who was a person with low resources, but this did not prevent himNo one expected anything from the stereotype.
Thus, a lack of ethics can be noticed, in addition to how the circumstances with the perception of people are well related, since wanting to acquire knowledge, commonly the receptor of knowledge that is to acquire this through what it wants to seekIt has been, some mathematics, a prestigious mathematician and so on with the other areas, it is of course depending on the region in which one is located, since this "discrimination" was not so everywhere.
On the other hand, the way in which the shared information is sought, is usually on the non -ethical side, which makes the information not authentic and the
That later I would confusion with the "author", which makes people look for this information after this event, but this "author" seeks to replicate this information but now he will not be able, and the information he shares is not of quality.
It is also important to emphasize how it is necessary.
This type of circumstances of the author of the information, play a role to such a degree that this can modify its way of preparing this, for example if a doctor who is just studying the study stage has a very specific meaning about their subjects,This when time passes by having more experiences that mark their life, they will change in such a way that they will be distributed, they go from the subconscious of this, since the time of disseminating the information will be different, at the time of when he received it.
Argument (History): A very clear event of this type of is that of the scientific-mathematics Marie Curie, which as we know 2 Nobel prizes, and was the discoverer of the radio, but it is in its time it was not taken seriously,For the simple fact that at that time the personal circumstance of this being a woman was obsolete and relegated to the work, so it was thought since the sharing of his knowledge nobody paid attention to being a woman, in then that the knowledge produced byThis was not taken seriously until half a century later, since it was an "inexhaustible" energy which
He made that while it was not taken as important by the scheme that the woman had at that time, half a century later it was considered, but still the possibility that it would have been considered, was depending on the circumstance that it had at that time whatwhich for people with that ideology did not let her progress.
Contra-argument (Natural Sciences): The creator of agrosiviculture, this process by which agriculture is elaborated, does so in a sustainable way and better pollutant for the earth, although the creator is not known, it is presumed to be that it comes fromorigin of the agricultural sector, which we can infer that he was a person with low resources, but his idea of creating this way of cultivating with less toxicity, was successfully achieved and implemented throughout history.
Finally, we can conclude that personal circumstances although, as we saw if they affect the knowledge, this will depend a lot on the time in which it is, as in the time of Marie Curie the simple fact of being a woman I play against him, something that this would not happen today, therefore the personal circumstances of the person, over time they will change, since these are very susceptible to change, therefore we must group this information in such a way that See decent since today’s people judge without knowing about the authors who promulg An answer that does influence personal circumstances because they change the perspective of someone’s knowledge, it is already due to traits of that time or fixed approaches which affect p OR MEDIA OWN TO THE AUTHOR, IS THAT IS THE CASE OF AGROSIVICULTURA, THAT HAS BEEN EFFECTED, Since this is usually raised for an objective.
Leave feedback