Opinion essay on leadership and power
Introduction
Leadership and power is a combination of actions that allow an organization to achieve a balance to achieve the goals and maintain harmony, although it is possible, it will not always be obeyed by the subordinate and it has to resort to leadership actions and leaders that allow the action of achieving organizational effectiveness.
What are the pros and cons of power in the organization?
In the organizations, various actions are presented that require control and regulation of workers’ behavior, due to objectives and goals that have to be met, which is why a power -based control system is required to exercise the authority that the authority that It is required to influence the behavior of people successfully.
We can find a number of pros and cons, since nothing happens in an organization until someone makes it happen, the influence requires to exercise power effectively.
- Accept that there are numerous interests in almost the entire organization because not everyone has the same interests, nor the interests of all are compatible with those of the leader.
- Understand that relevant position support individuals or groups regarding the important issues for the leader, that is, we must consider that there are different points, so it is important Agree that those who do not coincide.
- In order for things to be done, you must have power and that in the case of those who oppose, you must have more power than them, to understand where the power comes from, it must be recognized that there is nothing wrong with acquiring and exercising power with ethics and professionalism, we must increase influence and thus ensure increase the effectiveness to achieve goals.
- Recognize the strategies and tactics with which it is acquired and exercises power in organizations, we must take advantage of the structure of the organization and the form of individual power.
In this way we will understand how Pfeffer concludes, "we have to understand the strategies and tactics of use of power to consider the gamma of available methods and apply the one that seems the most effective"
What has the greatest impact on the company: power or leadership?
These are two totally different concepts since power is the ability to exercise control over a person or a group with authority and leadership as a process to influence others to facilitate achievement to the objectives of an organization, it is not necessary to A formal leader position to exercise leadership behavior.
From my point of view, leadership has a greater impact since as Warren Bennis describes, efficient leaders are characterized by:
- Give direction and meaning to the people who direct.
- Build trust.
- Favor the action and acceptance of risk.
- Being suppliers of hope in a tangible and symbolic way, this helps to be achieved.
So we can say that who causes greater impact on a company is leadership because a leader is not necessarily a manager or someone with authority, however, the ability of a leader to an influence that leads to the success of achieving a goal or goal, due to the leadership exercised and some kind of power is necessarily required.
What tools would implement in his organization to establish authority?
Starting from legitimate power or position, it comes from the position, so the organization gives formal power (authority) to an individual the right to send other individual individuals.
The fact of possessing authority does not mean that subordinates will obey, so that an obeceful subordinate must be in an indifference zone and can also be in an area of non -indifference for what by ethical principles may not obey.
There are different types of tools to establish authority such as:
- Rewarding power, influence on others based on the hope of a prize.
- Coercive power, influence on others based on fears.
- Expert power, influence capacity related to some skill, special ability or knowledge.
- Reference power, is based on the identification of a subordinate with its supervisor.
- Structural power, the structure of the organization confers power.
Considering that each situation is different, even when you have the authority to order and execute something, the expert or reference power pays better results in the organization because they influence the skills, skills, knowledge and identification of the subordinate and the supervisor.
What kind of analysis would you do to identify the leaders of each of their areas?
Initially, investigations and analysis focused on identifying intellectual, emotional, physical reason as well as other personal qualities associated with the success of leadership, by observing behavior in group situations, vote, nomination and biographical data analysis.
To identify the leaders I would focus on evaluating their intelligence (intellectual coefficient), personality (people with individuality), physical characteristics (age, height, weight and appearance), supervisory capacity (efficient use of any supervised practice that are indicated by the requirements individuals of a situation).
Another way to identify leaders is through competencies and leadership styles (Muller and Turner (2010), evaluating objective orientation, involvement and commitment.
conclusion
Concluding, power and leadership have a close relationship, the use of power is a means to achieve obedience and leadership is a means that influences behavior based on the characteristics of each situation through voluntary acceptance, authority And leadership are above power and management when it is necessary to the company’s politics and that will generate value and success of the organization’s goal.
"Leadership implies power (authority), but power (authority) does not imply necessary leadership"
Leave feedback