Literature In Theatrical Works

0 / 5. 0

Literature in Theatrical Works

Introduction

To start, we will comment on the eighth scene of the play entitled Bohemia Lights by Ramón Valle-Inclán published in 1924. This scene is part of the second tour of the top star, here he goes before the minister to claim the way he was treated in the previous scenes, that is, the V-VII scenes (detention for public scandal, imprisonment). How through this scene and the points we are going to address we will reach the criticisms that we wanted to reveal?, To what extent is this scene a key scene in the economy of the work? This scene is considered as a key in the economy of the work first because it is located at the center of the book so it structures it by dividing it into two parts. 

Developing

Also because it is from her that the state of Max will change by accepting the money given by the minister that until now had refused to do that was not accepted exterior help. Scene VIII is important because it is considered by critics, as the central nucleus of the work when seeing in it the principle of the greatest degradation to which Max will arrive once the pension offered by the minister offers. Thus, it becomes the deforming concave mirror from which the symmetric structure of the piece is established from number seven, as indicated in the scheme included in the study of this edition. How is the characterization of the protagonists Max and the Minister? First of all it is important to say that both protagonists are not characterized by the same media.

With that I mean that the minister appears rather characterized in the dimensions while Max is mostly characterized in the dialogue between the different characters of the scene and charges less importance in the dimensions. Starting with the minister is characterized first by his trade even if his name "Paco" or "Don Francisco" is mentioned in the dialogues but that is not very important. We notice that this character belongs rather to the world of official power, therefore it is associated with the power of the State then everything that has to do with politics which can lead us to interpret that he represents political power in general andeverything that has to do with him. On the other hand, we can emphasize that as I said it is only characterized twice in this scene.

And it is in the dimensions where we are only given its external appearance (prosopography) we can quote: “His excellence opens the door of his office and appears in shirt sleeves, the unbuttona cord, like two absurd eyes dancing on the belly."And" His excellence, tripudged, repainted, butian, responds with an old comedian start, in the good French melodrama."This description is not very positive, since it does not show a good facet of man with a juxtaposition of epitheter adjectives that suffer deformations with what we see a certain facet of the aging in it. With all this we can conclude that the minister suffers a half satire of his own person for the comfort that he can have in the face of such a position.

Characterization of the Minister: Truth and lie of his literary longings. Minister’s nostalgia attitude (before Dieguito): he has painfully renounced his ideal as a writer (but he has saved himself from bohemia). Real attitude of the minister (alone): comfort, apathy, apoltronation of the politician who knows with power. While the characterization of maximum star is mostly done in the dialogue between the minister and Dieguito from the psychological point of view, but also in certain dimensions we can find elements that physically characterize it. In the first place we can mention that they give him different pseudonyms for example Dieguito calls him of “bad-stretch” in contrast to his real name maximum star we can think that the idea of bad luck with what will happen at the end of the work (death of the protagonist (death of the protagonist (death of the).

Later in the scene they say "Goodbye, teacher" and "Goodbye, genius and disorder!”We highlight all his wisdom both at the intellectual level in the literary and moral environment. But not only, but physically it is characterized in two dimensions “Max Estrella appears on the door, pale, scratched, the crooked tie, the high and crazy expression."Here is the idea of madness that will be reinforced when they say" You are crazy!". In the other dimension it appears described as a puppet as inert: “Maximum star, with open arms in cross, upright, stopped eyes, tragic in its blind stillness, advances like a ghost.". It is also characterized by its blindness that gives it a certain sarcastic character with the minister we can mention “accidental blindness.’

But it puts it to enhance so that it is not pejorative for him when we know that it is really. Finally, his misery also characterizes him and is enhanced when he says that "the letters do not give to eat" and then by accepting the money offered by the minister despite his pride. It is important to mention that Max himself autocalifies in the paragraph “I am blind, they call me a poet, I live to make verses and live miserable. You are thinking that I am a drunk. Fortunately!"," Max Estrella is not the annoying poor "," the world is mine, everything smiles at me, I am a man without penalties ". It has a certain provocative attitude to be imposed on that official world, insisting and not respecting the decisions of the Ujier and Dieguito for example.

However, what these two characters have in common is their past with the memory of bohemia life for the minister and the life of the heroic bohemium that Max still has to which we can add a common passion for literature although by the ministerget smaller. We can conclude that maximum represents the typical literary bohemian, since it highlights all that upside down of the minister who prefers to leave space for memories, but forget that life. Bohemia: Bohemia life more passion for literature. We notice that the memory of past times is something important then with bohemia life. Max continues with his bohemian life while the minister has abandoned it for the political world. The literary bohemian is a marginalized being of the bourgeois social environment that leads to misery. 

It also goes against the official power (political corruption) established here by the minister who represents the authority “you were born an institutionalist, you are not a renegade of the world of dream” Literary bohemia leads to the illusion to disappointment and taskFrom the writer he approaches that of the beggar. The literary bohemium carries within itself the modern tragedy of the expired artist = mystical-poetic path that leads to art. Accepting bohemia is carrying the mask of irony, disguising itself to better observe the lag between literary aspirations and bourgeois and commercial society: taste of provocation plus the choice of marginality. A certain sympathy for popular spirit and vices while some intellectual aristocratism.

Be ambivalent and deformed. It gives me a parodic mode embodies the bohemian tragedy and puts himself outside the world that looks with irony (but is blind). Double sense of this bohemia: monstrous side of the artist’s drama in the face of the historical and social reality of his time, is equal to bohemia, as an extravagant, excessive, ambivalent attitude becomes the sperpentic deformation of a traditionalist and conventional Spain. More than a circumstantial aspect, bohemia suggests a new artistic vision of life by deformation and distortion. Nostalgia of the literary vocation for the minister. What background appears here? How criticism works? Max Estrella was to speak at first with the minister to protest against the behavior he had with him the police, but I end up accepting the money without solving any problem.

We can mention “Conste that I have come to ask for a relief for my dignity, and a punishment for some scoundrels. It should be noted. I was not allowed to leave the world without ever touched the background of reptiles ”. The idea that stands out is then for money to solve everything and allows some to remain in the silence of certain social injustices that have been committed within the official world. With this we see the superiority and power that the State can have and in this way how they can manipulate the "miserable" as Max. Here Max betrays himself, and by this means he enters the world of corruption and resembles himself with the “Canallas.’

conclusion

With this, the political and social reality of the Spain of that time is brought to light through Max that in addition to being the last bohemian in this scene also expresses an overview of the chaotic situation of that time with the misery in whichit’s found. People who are not from the same statute are criticized for example. The misery of the population is also enhanced through Max. ("Reserved funds" popularly called "reptiles" with which journalists are bribes). Criticism against police repression and the treatment that the police have with their detainees is what Max came to protest. There is a certain contempt for the art of writing through Dieguito as of the minister when assimilating him to misery and social baseness.

Free Literature In Theatrical Works Essay Sample

Related samples

Zika virus: Transmission form Introduction The Zika virus belongs to the Flaviviradae family, was found for the first time in a monkey called Rhesus febrile and in...

Zika virus: cases and prevention Introduction The World Health Organization (WHO) has confirmed that Zika is a virus caused through the mosquito bite which is...

Zeus The King of Greek mythology Introduction Zeus is the Olympic God of heaven and thunder, the king of all other gods and men and, consequently, the main figure...

Zeus's punishment to Prometheus Introduction Prometheus, punished by Zeus Prometheus, punished by Zeus. Prometheus is a ‘cousin’ of Zeus. He is the son of the...

Comments

Leave feedback

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *