Globalization in society
Introduction
A revolution that is present in everyone’s life, in the telecommunication created by civilization and as well as multiple networks that have been specialized. In this text it is told to tell what Giddens tells us, performing an analysis of what he proposes, emphasizing the chapters: tradition, family, and democracy.
Developing
Giddens in turn shows us the difficulty of communication when you have specialized content or its analysis in the media framemore complex and systematic of the phenomenon.
Then we see how the sociological tradition is transformed into a new era because of the globalization process. It is said that, in its improvement and generalization in areas such as administration, market and a particular coding system and the revolutionary binary transmission, they not only accelerated the way of sharing scientific, statistical, cultural and more than anything economic information, but alsoIt has become practically impossible to find setbacks or obstacles in markets that operate intangibles, especially financial and technological.
Without a doubt, large companies and states are the main beneficiaries of this technical change, together with the fact that the process has the respective mass dissemination through the Internet. Even so, however scandalous the technical change is, all this results in the ability to recover and accelerate cycles of economic accumulation, the means to generalize an intense cultural innovation are given, being a source of social crisis and disorganization.
From what Giddens arises, it tells us that it is the world cosmopolitan society that opens towards global cooperation and solidarity, which in turn leads us to the greatest demand for rehabilitation in different fundamental institutions such as the nation, family, family,work, nature, tradition, among others. It leads us to reflect on globalization, which leads us to create new awareness of the risks derived from greater complexity in institutions that proliferate day by day, with unexpected consequences, in some unwanted cases, through action.
Giddens calls the "manufactured risk" to the political problem that risks to suffer in consequences of achieving economic advantages, as given in the example of transgenic foods. They are features that precede the future society, against tradition and family. Which does not mean that they will disappear, rather they will break taboos.
conclusion
All this leads us to pluralistic democratization, which is considered the political ideal, with the exception of oil monarchies. That even with scandals for corruption and little interest in partisan policy, this democratic model is not questioned. In the growing importance of supra or plurinational institutions, they exert increased pressure by groups of interests or opinions, agitating the heterogeneous substatial communities, which require democratic deepening by their participants. Where global social, economic and ecological risks demand "global democracy".
Leave feedback