Forensic Psychological as a basis for evidence experts
Introduction.
As an expert witness to a family court. As an expert before a civil court. A forensic psychologist should not only prepare reports and evaluations of diverse type, but must also be able to testify about those reports and evaluations to explain them to the judge and the parties as an expert expert expert. A witness is an individual who has special knowledge of a specific matter, fact or topic about where he or she must testify in a legal procedure. Educational headings can supply the basis for an individual to be an expert witness, but a special skill or experience based on experience can also qualify an individual as an expert witness.
If an individual has the qualifications required to act as an expert witness, it is a determination of the Court of First Instance. The testimony of an expert witness is based rather on his state as an expert. The purpose of this expert evidence is to be able to provide the judge with the knowledge linked with a defined subject or subject, where the expert witness domains and expertise has technique and scientific where the judge is missing to resolve controversies between the parties.
An expert can be defined as a deponent that has specialized knowledge in a certain subject and that, for different circumstances, witnesses the facts of a case, which enables him to issue opinions or technical conclusions in the framework of a trial that perhaps inadmissibleIn the case of a normal witness.
Developing.
Importance of having an expert witness in a case
The objective of the expert evidence is to provide the judge with the knowledge related to a certain subject, in which the expert witness has the domain and technical and scientific expertise of which the judging entity lacks to direct the controversies between the parties. The expertise being an activity carried out by important people qualified through a prior judicial commission to provide an opinion with a valuation technical exhibition, the expert expert and / or witness must have the qualities, qualities and credentials with the highest standards of the industry to provideyour expertise to the case. Each counterpart represented by your lawyer can challenge the expert witness within the trial.
One of the tasks that lawyers have in a judicial process that includes an expert and / or expert witness is the discreditation of it to invalidate the opinion presented. To do this, the lawyer of who does not agree with the opinion or expert. The educational aspects, professional activities, the past work, among others will be on the checklist, and if in any of the previous points there are gray areas, they will be the perfect arguments to dissect the expert and / or expert witness with serious consequences.
That is why being an expert expert and / or witness requires a totally true, transparent and open professional and educational past, since a small detail makes the immense difference in a case. The constant creation of companies or temporary signatures, changes in the corporate name, high rotation of business partners, among others, are aspects that negatively affect the presentation of an expert expert and / or witness.
Business diversity remains to focus on the exceptional attributes by which the expert expert and / or witness was commissioned. Likewise, an unclear or unstable work past can be reasons why an expert can be discredited in a trial. Being an expert expert and / or witness requires beyond knowledge, technical and expertise, since, when contributing an opinion, the least desirable personal details will be afloat with the aim of discrediting the expert.
What are the rules of evidence to admit an expert witness?
Applicability of the rules.
Applicability to the General Court of Justice. Supreme Court and Court of Appeals. Civil and criminal cases. Procedures related to provisional calls and preliminary interdes and the ex -part procedures. PROCEDURES UNDER SPECIAL LAWS. Cause determination procedures to accuse. The opinions or inferences of a person as an expert witness can be based on facts or data perceived by her or within her personal or informed knowledge before or during the trial or view. If it is a matter of a nature that experts in that field reasonably rest in it to form opinions or make inferences on the matter in question, the facts or data do not have to be admissible in evidence.
Conclusions.
Ethical practice develops as it acquires professional experience and challenges are presented with each of the consultants. The ethical consideration of conducting the patient’s privacy, requires paying attention to the dimensions that concern him and here he must be sure that his consent to collect confidential information has been fully included and that it will be strictly used to reachAn evaluation of its mental and psychological state.
The purpose of the Code of Ethics is to provide guidance for psychologists and rules of professional behavior that can be applied by APA and other institutions that decide to adopt them. The Code of Ethics does not intend to be the basis of civil liability.
Leave feedback