- Tags:
- Show more
- Pages:
- 2
- Words:
- 550
Human Resource and Social Responsibility Name Institutional Affiliation Human Resource and Social Responsibility Case One: Financial Dilemma The issue surrounding the case involves distribution of limited resources to clients. Stanwick and Stanwick (2013) iterate that rules of utilitarianism state that a person should choose an option which creates maximum utility. As such, the services in the center should promote their services locally with hopes of increasing self-pay clients. The increased revenue will cater for the 25 percent cut by the state and cushion the center from financial difficulties. Cases of drug addiction vary in degree from one person to the next. As a human resource professional, the NOHSE guidelines demand that clients receive services without discrimination CITATION Eth16 l 1033 (Ethical Standards for Human Resource Professionals, 2016). Thus, the center should have a waitlist to ensure every person gets a fair chance for treatment. Given that the center handles critical human conditions, the Human Resource Department can organize a fundraising from the neighboring schools, churches, and neighborhoods to cater for the extra 150 people left out. In so doing, the charges for treatment remain the same without any negative effect on the center. Case Two: Ethics and Social Controversy The core issue facing the committee is funding for abortion-related services. If some affiliated organization seeks to create negative publicity. The board should focus on matters common to all parties. For example, they can counteract any bad publicity with issues of sex education, family planning, and abortion counseling offered by this particular center.
Leave feedback