- Tags:
- Show more
- Pages:
- 2
- Words:
- 550
Student’s name Institutional affiliation Date Argument Analysis - John Stuart Mill Philosopher John Mill tried to explain utilitarianism using the concept of higher and lower pleasures. He attempts to offer a critical analysis of the reasons for the difference in the different desires. He addresses the questions that have arisen based on comparing the various values of pleasures. Mill states that due to quality, there exist both higher and lower pleasures. He associates more moderate pleasure with bodily pleasure which can be experienced by both man and animals and classifies intellectual pleasure as being a greater pleasure, one that solely focuses on intellectual development. In a bid to factor in this understanding, it is best to ask how particular preferences are superior to others since both bring the intended happiness to the doer, concerning the theory of Utilitarianism. I do agree that the grouping of the distinct pleasures cannot be in the same category. For example, reading a book on Psychological effects of poverty on an individual does not give the same pleasure as eating ice cream on a sunny day. They totally differ in the aspects of ease of access and the lasting effects of the joy. In looking at this example, it is easy to understand why Stuart would classify pleasures into two groups. There are counter arguments that state that it is not possible for him to try to compare actions that are not alike, but John argues that based on their utility. It is evident that in his classification, he considered the ease of access to an absolute pleasure before classifying it as a higher or lower pleasure. In their youth, human beings have a lot of
Leave feedback