Apogeo Summary in Athens – Aristotle
Introduction:
Talking about Aristotle, leads to remember one of the most important philosophers in history and whose contributions have been quite saying over time.
Developing:
Aristotle’s work is made up of a wide variety of observations with respect to stars, weather, plants and animals.
In his work, work is also perceived in which he sought to analyze the experiences made by the human being in his personal life, when he relates to his family and the State. With regard to this interest on the part of Aristotle, the analytical intention of this could be denot. This becomes a clear call not to act with preconceived theories, but to study the phenomena rigorously and with minutia until they can draw their own conclusions from these.
If it is noteworthy aspects of great relevance according to the contributions made by Aristotle, it is concerned to mention that this philosopher was the first to mark clear limits between the individual study spaces through a unique philosophy;He is known as the founder of specialized research, but also of particular sciences. Up to this point it should be clarified that Aristotle saw philosophy as that science that allows us.
Now, as a surprising thing, in many thoughts the disciple hit the teacher’s ideas. Plato was Aristotle’s teacher;While Plato was a philosopher who was not a sympathizer of rhetoric, Aristotle if it was.
In his rhetoric, Aristotle investigates the foundations that corresponded to being, both logical and ethical, in addition to psychological and aesthetic, with which, according to this, there was the possibility of obtaining the preference of the audience through orality, however, for him this happened only when there was a substantiated knowledge and a significant contribution or contribution to the philosophical exercise and those who listen to us was carried out.
On the other hand, in what corresponded to his thought, Aristotle entered four "methodological maxims", which corresponded to being: guaranteeing the phenomena;discuss doctrinal opinions;Studying difficulties and as a fourth he stated that a summary procedure is linguistic analysis.
In what corresponds to the dialectic, for this philosopher, it consisted of being the art of argumentation. On the other hand, in terms of logic, Aristotle would be responsible for making the important discovery of the existence of argumentation models. Between these two aspects it is pertinent to highlight the existence of syllogisms, which give us the opportunity to through two propositions to reach a conclusion. It is inevitable that this conclusion will be related to the two propositions, since, if this is not carried out in such a way, we can discern that the exercise is not correct and ends up falling into falsehood.
Subsequently, when it refers to the philosophy of nature, it can be found that he was oblivious to a separation between the study of philosophy and that of particular sciences, so he cares and directs his studies in both. It takes as a central axis the substance and accidents, the substance corresponds to being, the authentic essence of each person, while accidents, refer to the changes that may exist in terms of place, space and time.
These two factors relate very closely, while one remains immutable, another is conditioned by different elements.
With regard to the Aristotle science. The divinity of Aristotle does not have the attributes that we can see in the God of Christianity, for example, omnipotence, omniscience and absolute goodness.
On the other hand, Aristotle wrote about various independent disciplines: among them ethics and politics stands out. These last two comply with the philosophy of human affairs and such affirmation can even be quite true, because both are considered fundamental for the living and acting of each human being and their relationship with society.
In that sense, politics cares about studying the nature of the human being and calls it as a "political animal", a phrase that has remained latent with the passing of the centuries. Likewise, the policy studies these citizen relations with the systems established in the polis and looks at how they can work ideally, while, in the relationship to ethics, it was responsible for investigating the moral and intellectual values of themen. In the same way, he explained everything related to the normative rector of each human being that would be happiness, which is not considered to be lucky or achieve some feat in particular, but is a factor that goes beyond banality,It is the product of repeated effort and focused on the search for our good and that of the other. It can be inferred that it is called normative rector because this supposes the compass that guides our steps, since we all act or work according to the so longed for happiness.
Conclusion:
All these works created by Aristotle, are currently an essential part of everything that revolves around philosophy, since many of their theories have greatly influenced our way of seeing and interpreting the world.
Leave feedback