Analysis: Exhibition of reasons-before Franz Kafka’s law
Two interesting texts are presented in the reader’s hands: the Kafkian story vor demnetz (before the law) and exhibition of reasons, written by Professor José Calvo González. Both texts are within the work of the law or will it be fiction?, written by Professor Calvo.
Starting with Franz Kafka’s story, before the law, it is an apologist or parable (this is a kind of story whose plot contributes a moral teaching) located in the novel entitled Der ProzESS (the process) written in 1915. The exhibition of reasons However, it is a kind of reflection made by Professor Calvo from the idea that gives him a title (according to the SAR; “Gral. Preamble of a normative text in which its motivation is recorded.)
Franz Kafka’s apologist is an identified door as the law which curious peasant wants to cross. Before her there is a guard who denies the entrance at the beginning more after observing the curiosity of the farmer suggests in entering but not before warning that there would be more guards, each more powerful than the previous one. The peasant, fearful, decides to wait for the express concession of permission from the guard. The years go by and the peasant is still there, waiting for the moment. Even so, he tries to enter the guard but this, impassive, still does not expressly allow it. Arriving at the end of his days, the peasant asks the guard why even being the law so sought. The guardian responds “no one else could enter here because this entry was intended for you only. Now I will close."
José Calvo González’s reasons begins by talking about the concept of exposure of reasons, implying that it is something out of the law. He talks about the Kafka story as an example of this, concluding that the exposition of reasons is nothing more than the implicit logos overendoned to the law. After talking about the Kafkian text, it goes on to analyze the antologist’s labro, where he defends that the value of this trade is not in the result but in the motivation of this. Then he goes on to talk about the composition of the book, where he emphasizes that the brevity of the texts was intentionally. Finally, Professor Calvo writes that this work was not to follow a fashion, but to bring out the "iusliteratura" causing him to obtain a very valuable source of literature, accompanied by data and bibliography of the authors of the texts.
To analyze the Kafka story, you must first put each figure of the story with reality: the peasant who tries to enter without success could be a person with the intention of starting a litigation, the door the law and the guardian the different parts of the different parts of theprocess. Focusing it from here, it could be said that the text is about the "entry barrier" that the law possesses, making this alienate of society. This entry barrier could be defined as the difficulty involved in understanding this science. Paradoxically, it would be concluded that the law is made for the citizen more this cannot dispose of it even when reaching its hand: this “citizen of Schrödinger” is protected by law and at the same time it is not.
Even with this idea of Kafka’s text, Professor Calvo appears, this being an exhibition of reasons (in this case it is not a normative text) of his work of the law, or will it be fiction?. The explanation that gives the motivation that led to creating this anthology is drawn: “… or it is an anthology to use, and the radicality of this alleged arrogance is justified by the obvious proof of a total lack of literary anthologies of the lawor any other notion or principle of law … "
As for structure, Professor Calvo’s text is divided into 21 paragraphs. Really, more than an introduction, knot and outcome text, these are several fragments that have their own structure and, in turn, connect between them. If you had to put it linearly, the first three paragraphs would be the introduction because it is there where the idea of exposure of motives exposes. The following paragraphs would be the knot, because Kafka’s comment is spinning before the law with the development of his work itself. Would occupy from the fourth paragraph to the tenth third. From the third to the twenty -first we would find the outcome, where he explains the true motivation of the creation of the work. This text houses literary and legal registration.
Franz Kafka usually fuses introduction, knot and outcome due to the brevity of his stories. In this case, an introduction can be glimpsed in the first two sentences of the fragment. In about twenty words, Kafka introduces all the elements of the story. Development is clearer since this form almost complete the text, ending at the time the farmer asks his last question. From this last doubt, the outcome is formed. This text has a purely literary record.
It is interesting as Kafka exposes the idea of exposure of reasons in his work: something can be so open that it can cause fear. It is also curious the behavior of the peasant before that tacit permission granted by the guard and the blind trust in him: he never saw the other guards from within or had a way of knowing if they existed. Right now the ideas buzz in my head as if it were a hive of bees. If we carefully analyzed the text, we can verify that the peasant really could have entered the dread more to what there were after the threshold prevented it, being the words of the guard what most twisted his will and that we could resort to the old saying of "Do not judge a book on its cover ”since the peasant blindly trusted the guard of the Guardian when he told him that there would be more guards. I also disturb the idea that Kafka drops at the end of the text when the guardian says “nobody else could enter here, because this entry was intended for you only."That is: she is out of the law for the fear that gives her to face her due to how open the door is while only waiting for him because it is he who wanted to enter. Excludes him including him and includes excluding him.
Free Analysis: Exhibition Of Reasons-Before Franz Kafka’S Law Essay Sample
Zika virus: Transmission form Introduction The Zika virus belongs to the Flaviviradae family, was found for the first time in a monkey called Rhesus febrile and in...
Zika virus: cases and prevention Introduction The World Health Organization (WHO) has confirmed that Zika is a virus caused through the mosquito bite which is...
Zeus The King of Greek mythology Introduction Zeus is the Olympic God of heaven and thunder, the king of all other gods and men and, consequently, the main figure...
Zeus's punishment to Prometheus Introduction Prometheus, punished by Zeus Prometheus, punished by Zeus. Prometheus is a ‘cousin’ of Zeus. He is the son of the...
Analysis: Exhibition Of Reasons-Before Franz Kafka’S Law
0 / 5. 0
Analysis: Exhibition of reasons-before Franz Kafka’s law
Two interesting texts are presented in the reader’s hands: the Kafkian story vor demnetz (before the law) and exhibition of reasons, written by Professor José Calvo González. Both texts are within the work of the law or will it be fiction?, written by Professor Calvo.
Starting with Franz Kafka’s story, before the law, it is an apologist or parable (this is a kind of story whose plot contributes a moral teaching) located in the novel entitled Der ProzESS (the process) written in 1915. The exhibition of reasons However, it is a kind of reflection made by Professor Calvo from the idea that gives him a title (according to the SAR; “Gral. Preamble of a normative text in which its motivation is recorded.)
Franz Kafka’s apologist is an identified door as the law which curious peasant wants to cross. Before her there is a guard who denies the entrance at the beginning more after observing the curiosity of the farmer suggests in entering but not before warning that there would be more guards, each more powerful than the previous one. The peasant, fearful, decides to wait for the express concession of permission from the guard. The years go by and the peasant is still there, waiting for the moment. Even so, he tries to enter the guard but this, impassive, still does not expressly allow it. Arriving at the end of his days, the peasant asks the guard why even being the law so sought. The guardian responds “no one else could enter here because this entry was intended for you only. Now I will close."
José Calvo González’s reasons begins by talking about the concept of exposure of reasons, implying that it is something out of the law. He talks about the Kafka story as an example of this, concluding that the exposition of reasons is nothing more than the implicit logos overendoned to the law. After talking about the Kafkian text, it goes on to analyze the antologist’s labro, where he defends that the value of this trade is not in the result but in the motivation of this. Then he goes on to talk about the composition of the book, where he emphasizes that the brevity of the texts was intentionally. Finally, Professor Calvo writes that this work was not to follow a fashion, but to bring out the "iusliteratura" causing him to obtain a very valuable source of literature, accompanied by data and bibliography of the authors of the texts.
To analyze the Kafka story, you must first put each figure of the story with reality: the peasant who tries to enter without success could be a person with the intention of starting a litigation, the door the law and the guardian the different parts of the different parts of theprocess. Focusing it from here, it could be said that the text is about the "entry barrier" that the law possesses, making this alienate of society. This entry barrier could be defined as the difficulty involved in understanding this science. Paradoxically, it would be concluded that the law is made for the citizen more this cannot dispose of it even when reaching its hand: this “citizen of Schrödinger” is protected by law and at the same time it is not.
Even with this idea of Kafka’s text, Professor Calvo appears, this being an exhibition of reasons (in this case it is not a normative text) of his work of the law, or will it be fiction?. The explanation that gives the motivation that led to creating this anthology is drawn: “… or it is an anthology to use, and the radicality of this alleged arrogance is justified by the obvious proof of a total lack of literary anthologies of the lawor any other notion or principle of law … "
As for structure, Professor Calvo’s text is divided into 21 paragraphs. Really, more than an introduction, knot and outcome text, these are several fragments that have their own structure and, in turn, connect between them. If you had to put it linearly, the first three paragraphs would be the introduction because it is there where the idea of exposure of motives exposes. The following paragraphs would be the knot, because Kafka’s comment is spinning before the law with the development of his work itself. Would occupy from the fourth paragraph to the tenth third. From the third to the twenty -first we would find the outcome, where he explains the true motivation of the creation of the work. This text houses literary and legal registration.
Franz Kafka usually fuses introduction, knot and outcome due to the brevity of his stories. In this case, an introduction can be glimpsed in the first two sentences of the fragment. In about twenty words, Kafka introduces all the elements of the story. Development is clearer since this form almost complete the text, ending at the time the farmer asks his last question. From this last doubt, the outcome is formed. This text has a purely literary record.
It is interesting as Kafka exposes the idea of exposure of reasons in his work: something can be so open that it can cause fear. It is also curious the behavior of the peasant before that tacit permission granted by the guard and the blind trust in him: he never saw the other guards from within or had a way of knowing if they existed. Right now the ideas buzz in my head as if it were a hive of bees. If we carefully analyzed the text, we can verify that the peasant really could have entered the dread more to what there were after the threshold prevented it, being the words of the guard what most twisted his will and that we could resort to the old saying of "Do not judge a book on its cover ”since the peasant blindly trusted the guard of the Guardian when he told him that there would be more guards. I also disturb the idea that Kafka drops at the end of the text when the guardian says “nobody else could enter here, because this entry was intended for you only."That is: she is out of the law for the fear that gives her to face her due to how open the door is while only waiting for him because it is he who wanted to enter. Excludes him including him and includes excluding him.
Free Analysis: Exhibition Of Reasons-Before Franz Kafka’S Law Essay Sample
Related samples
Zika virus: Transmission form Introduction The Zika virus belongs to the Flaviviradae family, was found for the first time in a monkey called Rhesus febrile and in...
Zika virus: cases and prevention Introduction The World Health Organization (WHO) has confirmed that Zika is a virus caused through the mosquito bite which is...
Zeus The King of Greek mythology Introduction Zeus is the Olympic God of heaven and thunder, the king of all other gods and men and, consequently, the main figure...
Zeus's punishment to Prometheus Introduction Prometheus, punished by Zeus Prometheus, punished by Zeus. Prometheus is a ‘cousin’ of Zeus. He is the son of the...
Comments