A judge from Salvador was accused of sexual aggression
The incident occurred in El Salvador on February eighteen of two thousand nineteen, where a civil judge of the Supreme Court of Justice, Mr. Jaime Escalante took a ten -year -old boy who played for the residential speaker II of the municipality of Tonacatepequeby the shoulders and proceeded to touch his genitals and then fleeing from the place while his indignant mother was heading to stop him.
On this the Prosecutor’s Office accused him of sexual aggression, in criminal matters so that there is a possible conviction, according to the Criminal Code of that country, between 8 and 12 years in prison. Given this the defendant’s defense claimed that the touch does not put the intimacy or sexuality of the girl at risk.
The First Criminal Chamber resolved in favor of the judge claiming that it was not a crime what happened on February 18, 2019 between the ten -year -old girl and the judge.
Conclusions
Brazil as most Latin American countries suffer a terrible recession.
There are many people in the situation of Souza who live with few resources and do not have a stable job and fixed salary.
There is no security in these countries for low -income people and taking only the example of Brazil we can highlight as the President does directly ignore all these situations that arise.
Trained people are needed who know how to make a good and equitable distribution and administration of resources. It is not fair that the "rich" in the middle of the recession become richer and the poorest "poor".
In my opinion, the root of this is submerged in ignorance, because the situation that makes the rich are richer is that they have enough knowledge, more than resources, to be able to create their own businesses and not depend on a salarypermanent.
In Ecuador it was about helping people under resources granting credits for entrepreneurship, this did not give the expected result because many people ended up breaking when not knowing how to administer it.
Education is the key to everything
The situation that was lived in Bolivia seems to be a way of expressing distrust with the previous government that was declared "legally" winner at the polls of voting.
To give their opinion about it is to get into a complicated situation, because many things can be speculated about it. On the one hand there is the fact that the elections have been won precisely and on the other there is the distrust of the opposition for this, but;Does the opposition want the will of the people or only seeks its own benefit?
Bolivia has currently witnessed the power that the opposition has to make its will and this is reflected in the multiple social problems that it has caused in the country, as well as in the final result of these.
Today, November 11, two thousand nineteen Bolivia has a bittersweet flavor in the mouth, the opposition won, the president and his bench gave the position and the new elections are expected.
Now it only remains to ask ourselves, was it the best for the country or the interests of a few with greater force of repression they won the battle?
Time can answer the questions, because with the assumptions nothing is reached.
Leave feedback