The memes and humor
Introduction
Levinson and, subsequently, Rodríguez Rosique’s theoretical development assume that irony is a properly contextual phenomenon and that causes the investment of conversational principles, so the ironic speaker or writer uses specific marks and indicators that help the recipient to understandthe irony.
Developing
The Griale Group has given an explanation of the irony supported by the pragmatic vision of Levinson, where this implies the investment of the quality requirement that governs on any communicative exchange. This investment has an impact on the conversational principles that Levinson provides on his work. Thus, Ruiz Gurillo defines:
Irony is therefore conceived as a pragmatic phenomenon that is based on indicators and brands, so it is possible to offer an explanation that goes beyond the particular contexts in which irony occurs. We understand by brands those elements that help ironic interpretation. For its part, the indicators are ironic structures.
The author assures that the appearance of these brands and indicators does not guarantee an ironic context, but there is a relationship between their employment and the ironic environment that the issuer wants to create. Therefore, brands and indicators are linguistic resources that give rise to a straight and concrete interpretation, but in the ironic contexts they become specific clues that help the interlocutor express itself in a way or that the receiver interprets well the message it receives. In this sense, Padilla and Gironzetti list four possibilities that relate humor and irony:
Humor + Irony Humor – irony irony + Humor irony – Humor
These relationships are not defined for speakers and researchers, but Ruiz Gurillo summarizes in five hypotheses the differential aspects:
- Irony is a pragmatic fact;Humor is semantic and pragmatic at the same time.
- Irony and humor are eco -use of language, but the difference lies in what echoes.
- Irony and humor are contrast phenomena.
- Irony and humor are two forms of denial of meaning: the first is indirect and the second is a kind of antonymy, so irony involves negative inferences, while humor requires the replacement of one script by another.
conclusion
Irony is the violation of the quality requirement, which governs on any communicative exchange and humor is a behavior that relies on six types of knowledge resources, where the infraction of pragmatic principles is. In irony the violation of the principle of quantity acts;In humor, the prominent phenomenon is the violation of the principle of regulations.
Leave feedback