University students and the beginning of their work stage
Introduction
This research would be a quantitative nature with the purpose of analyzing and observing university students who are between their first year until their baccalaureate and seeing the jobs they have and salaries during that time. There are more and more students in universities, but increasingly difficult to study, keep quality of life or pay their debts for student loans after graduating. We will see the difficulties of the students could face if they work for pleasure or need and delay their studies and personal life to be able, to be up to date with the high university costs in the world.
Developing.
The methodology that would be used would be the next investigation through books, data and statistics, usually a quantitative foundation investigation would be. In natural and social sciences, quantitative research is the systematic empirical research of observable phenomena through statistical, mathematical or computational techniques. The objective of quantitative research is to develop and use mathematical models, theories and hypotheses related to phenomena.
The measurement process is essential for quantitative research because it provides the fundamental connection between empirical observation and mathematical expression of quantitative relationships. Quantitative data are all data that are numerical, such as statistics, percentages, etc. In the investigation the data will be analyzed with the help of statistics and expects the numbers to produce an impartial result that can be generalized to a larger population.Literature review
To start looking on the subject of Student Employees, the NCES (National Center for Education Statistics) have done several studies on student employment in recent years using different measurement variables. Many undergraduate students from 16 to 64 years work at the same time that they are enrolled in school. In 2017, the percentage of university students who were employed was higher among part -time students (81 percent) than among full -time students (43 percent)
Being employed can help a student pay their classes and other subsistence expenses;It can also be associated, either positively or negatively, with the academic performance of a student. Therefore, it is important to examine employment patterns among undergraduate students and how these patterns vary according to the student’s characteristics.
Among full -time registered university students in 2017, there were no measurable differences between the percentages of women women (45 percent) and male students (41 percent) who were employed. However, among part -time registered university students, a higher percentage of men who were used (84 against 78 percent).
In 2017, the percentage of full -time university students who were employed was lower among Asian students (29 percent) than among black students (39 percent), white (45 percent), Hispanics (46 percent)and two or more races (49 percent). In addition, a lower percentage of blacks or full -time Hispanic students was used. The percentage of part -time undergraduate students who were employed did not vary considerably among racial / ethnic groups.
The American Educational Research Association has data that can tell us that the use of university students has constantly increased for at least four decades. At present, approximately 80% of all university students are employed while completing their undergraduate education. Even among students under 24 years in universities of 4 years, more than 50% are employed during the school year.
Although the empirical research carried out to date suggest some general trends, studies that evaluate the use of students and higher education are sometimes inconsistent and even contradictory. Despite the high prevalence of student employment, theoretical models have not been developed to explain the relationship between employment and students’ results. This article briefly reviews the empirical literature of Employment and Student Education. Possible reasons for inconsistencies are suggested, including the challenges raised by methodological problems and the absence of theoretical conceptualization.
Some final suggestions are offered to address these empirical challenges.Employment Table of University Students from the United States Department of Commerce. The percentage of full -time high -time high school students were lower in 2015 (43 percent) than in 2005 (50 percent). Similarly, the percentage of part -time university students who were used in 2015 (78 percent) was lower than in 2005 (86 percent). The percentages of full or partial time students who were used in 2010 and 2015 were not very different from one another.
In a report made by the University of George Town (Learning While Earning) it gives an explanation to the financial reality of the capitalist world where students who just arrive at the university are located and the extremely importance is to deal with studies for a future Carera andhave part -time salary. The increase in registration costs, family obligations, the creation of a curriculum vitae and the management of the curves that life can throw, are just some of the reasons to work for school is a necessity for many students.
An average of 70 to 80 percent of students full or partial are employed on or outside the campus. This prevalence of student employment has aroused interest between professionals and policy formulators to explore and, ultimately, take advantage of the role of student employment, specifically employment on campus, about student success. If done effectively, employment on campus can provide students with greater financial security, while improving learning, career preparation and persistence results.
By recognizing these benefits, many institutions have advanced in the use of the Federal Work and Study Program and Employment Programs based on Campus funded by institutions such as a high priority research area that can positively impact today’s students. Employment within universities is a good part -time solution but it would even better find a way to do cheaper education and lead students to look for high schools with better jobs. (2019)
The US Census Office. UU. He updated the statistics of the post-secondary employment results (PSEO) with the publication of the profit tabs of the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor and the University of Wisconsin-Madison. In addition, the Census Office updated the PSEO display tool to include these two institutions and allow filtering by degree level. PSEO tabs show the income and employment results for graduates of postsecundaria institutions in the United States, and are generated by linking the transcription records of graduates with the dynamics data of longitudinal employers (Lehd).
The Pilot Publication of Profit Results informs the profits by institution, degree field, grade level and graduation cohort for 1, 5 and 10 years after graduation. This offers future students a comprehensive evaluation tool to see how much money they could obtain by title and institution throughout the country. American government census data which measures several salary difference through the first year after graduation until compared to several years of work in that field of education.
A fascinating study of "Routledge Taylor and Francis Group" is that they seek data on Chinese students who live in urban and rural areas and how that affects their university qualifications, but more important as it affects their jobs of jobs depending on their past placeof parenting or geographical housing. Regarding the differences in employment results, Qin and PEI (2011) point out that the probability of employment is lower for university students with rural background than for the University Students with urban history and analyze this result from the perspective of whatSocial.
Survey to conclude that a greater proportion of university students with household records enter the bodies of the party and government and manage work units at the central levels of work, and the annual labor income of university students withUrban household records exceed students with rural household records. They should be noted that differences in share capital (especially attributed social capital) and human capital (graduate from different levels of universities) causes differences in the achievement of work between university students with records of rural and urban households.
However, some investigations also point out that urban-rural factors are not direct causal factors, and family factors The economic context is the basic force that affects the use of university students. Children from high -income urban families have a clear advantage in the employment process and more easily obtain greater income in the first job, but children from low -income urban families face even more disadvantageous employment situations than children from rural families . Literature even about student cases in other parts of the world such as in Europe (Croatia) here we can observe the following failures of labor laws in the protection of student workers.
Conclusions.
In the first place, the student’s work does not undergo the work provisions act, which means that the student does not have the same rights and privileges as regular workers as, combined with the characteristic of relative financial affordability of such suchwork for workers, they can lead to workers’ exploitation. Another form of legal misuse refers to a large number of hours and a great income made by such contracts, since there are no limit prescribed in the two.
In addition to this, employers often use student contracts to pay the work done by a non -student. Secondly, as seen in the general description of the job offers for students, most of the work done by the students do not differ from the standard full -time work carried out by the regular workers, which entails two problems: one concerningto the students themselves, and another to regular employees.
Leave feedback