Theory of learning in mathematical sciences and history
Introduction.
Throughout life there are many events that confuse our perspective, we reach the point of understanding something, but not being able to justify it, many come associated with personal knowledge, but we should all develop the ability to help understand difficulty topics To be able to justify our learning. This is how, by reason we can go beyond our thoughts, create an idea before knowing the result, the analogy in this case can be defined as the logical comparison of two entities to establish their equal points and differences, to build on that base, later knowledge.
While the study of analogies is not known in a broad way. We have been able to demonstrate through analogies a great advance in the development of the brain of individuals. From sensory perception the aspects of each of the people changed according to their way of thinking and their way of seeing the world. Because of this, we who capture knowledge are difficult for us.
On the other hand, the intellectual development of people is often affected by various events that are marking each of their visions, also showing their problems., What analogy seeks is a balance between understanding and justifying what everyone is doing with their personal knowledge. For many people it is difficult to justify something and much more when that something is about knowledge, that is, the things we learn, because in the short term we forget this generally happens with students of schools and schools; that as time passes they are gradually forgetting things they learned and for not putting into practice they forgot.
But they also generated new ideas. A very big problem with respect to learning also happens in history, since we encounter this issue, we must clarify that it is somewhat complicated due to the trajectory that encompasses human beings. Likewise, mathematics interfers with analogies due to the way it develops so that people generate knowledge. Many are the intrigues that are growing in relation to the proposed topic, since it is not common last years?
DEVELOPING
In the first instance, what is analogy within mathematics is announced and how this can help a better understanding. On the one hand, the analogy mainly seeks that the ability of each person to solve a mathematical exercise increases from 1 to 10 to understand the mathematical reasoning and that the calculation of numbers ceases to be a bit mechanical and more thinking and of this way to find a balance point in order to obtain good results in a short time, in this way it is how it is involved in the mathematical area.
This type of reasoning is also raised so that each of the people can generate their own knowledge through the different kinds of mathematical logic in order to seek their strategic point and to involve each of their knowledge. A clear example for analogies in the mathematical field is the study of logarithms. We put this example because the understanding of logarithms is very complex and it is not just about making mathematical calculations.
Since if you do not understand how this type should be resolved, it is very difficult for you, but with simple tips and techniques you can reach the resolution, the analogy plays a very important role within this subject because the techniques to The ones I mean are just based on this study. In this way it can be identified that through reason we can put into practice various knowledge acquired over time, many of the time we are able to recognize an event or a process with the help of our without conscious.
This happens in mathematics, since this area embarks an endless line of complex learning but that over time turns out to be much more feasible when solving them. The keys we are finding to make this easier are known as analogies.
In the same way, history is involved if we now apply analog analysis to the transit of medieval philosophy as modern we can discover the conceptual structures that define much of the philosophical problems posed for centuries, until we can determine to a large extent the contemporary philosophy.
Talking a little history as it is known, Descartes went through being the founder of modern thought, characterized, above all, by his rupture with traditional knowledge. Actually, what Descartes knows as ‘ancient philosophy’ is a set of rhetorical recipes commonly used in schools, which barely represented the ankylose spectrum of what had been a thought of an extraordinary vitality. Descartes denies all value to the teaching of schools, and proposes a program that must be initially initiated from the most absolute origins: the doubt regarding traditional knowledge and individual knowledge.
The doctrine of the distinctions is particularly important, because through it the diversity of ways in which the human intellect can face the task of analyzing and understanding the reality that is objectively presented to it is explained. Indeed, extracting the differences that separate things is what allows the knowledge of being, since, if such an operation were not possible, thought would have continued indefinitely caught by the florid Parmenides paradoxes, which opened an impassable abyss between the unit of being and the multiplicity of non-being. It is not strange, therefore, that the doctrine of the distinctions becomes the knot of the controversy that faces traditional philosophy with the new currents from which modern thinking will be born.
The story for its part makes us known to reason, and this is how Descartes mentions events related to the knowledge that we are acquiring day by day and teaching in schools. For this philosopher this knowledge was not valid, the most important thing for him was to leave the traditional side and said that true individual knowledge is in experiences. LEADS MORE LIVES MORE YOU KNOW. In this way it is believed that learning is routine, but over time this idea was changing for the great reception that knowledge has to help other people have the same ideal and the same knowledge.
conclusion.
We can conclude by saying that the analogy within the different areas of study (mathematics and history) plays a fundamental role, because of how they are found in question in every thing we study, therefore, analogies help individual knowledge that individual knowledge It is shared, it also seeks to contribute to understand things in an easier way. Within the field of exact sciences we can say that analogies help us to understand literal problems, such as the example we cite.
If there were no help techniques, it would be very difficult to solve logarithms. On the other hand, the story what earns with the analogies is mainly to generate a new knowledge from the knowledge that we acquire previously, analyzing and understanding what we want to idealize this idea objectively. The modern thought of all people should not distort the past. Therefore, it can be said that within the school or educational field, the analogy does not affect anything, but simply try to improve the way in which the ways of teaching are developing, that at some point they generate a great benefit in us.
Bibliography
- Florido, f. L. (May 2, 2012). The Student Resource Portal.
- S/n. (June 27, 2015). Mathematics classes online.
Leave feedback