The way of working of the modern world
The human being, in principle usually has a nature, in some aspect, vertical;Since time immemorial there was always someone who ‘orders’ and someone who ‘obeys’. There are several explanations of this fact which are intrinsically related to how we have to communicate;The way of transmitting ideas, of modulating them, has great importance in the influence they end up having;and therefore;It is one of the factors that most influence how the world works today.
Popularity, the influence of certain ideas, therefore it cannot be explained if it is nothing but through the dynamics of human interaction. The way in which an idea will achieve popularity will be yes, and only if, it is communicated in a certain way, which in a certain context is the correct. When the influence of a certain idea is expected to be immense;That influences hundreds, thousands of people, the way of communicating it begins to play an even more important role, because, it begins to be a job of a number of abysmal people, which, in current times it implies a very important economic cost. Today, influencing masses of people is one of the most sought after tasks by many organizations;Y;It is impossible to think of a large organization that does not have policies of that style about it.
Governments are no exception, although there is a detail that should not be ignored;There are already several centuries ago. They were long before the digital revolution;When the world was supposedly ‘different’. Democratic governments depend to a very high extent on popularity;and popularity;As previously analyzed depending on the high measure of the way of transmitting ideas;which requires a high human and economical cost.
The representation that governments offer about their ‘represented’ by many is considered limited, liar, a merely image of image. But in reality the great ideas that the masses carry, if they have sufficient influence, they can (and even do it!) In government decisions. Actually ‘representation’ tells us about how sufficiently influential ideas have no choice but.
Of course, some will argue, that the ruler on duty can make decisions that not ‘representative’, and in fact they do;They are human beings, and human beings always have interests, from there their vertical nature;idealize rulers in this way is an idea that should, minimally, look like Zonza. But it would be valid to say that, in general, people’s ideas influence the behavior of the rulers;And they have no choice;Well that and only that is the path that led them to where they are. It is also important to observe that there are always unpopular decisions that in certain contexts are the most appropriate;nevertheless;It is remarkable as today measures of that style are discreet.
There are human behaviors that were always invariant in time, as was analyzed here. There are however processes that with history were changing;The world was not the same after commercial airplanes will be popularized. Recent technological revolutions cause ideas to be transmitted at an immensely greater pace than before;this implies;that the world interacts to a much greater extent;Therefore the rhythm of decisions, processes, technological development cannot be compared to the previously existing;Y;The permanent improvement of the quality of life of society is a direct consequence of this fact.
Technology also has influence on democratic processes, very current examples could be the influence of social networks in Arab spring;Such processes would not have occurred in the way they did it at another time. The detonating ideas of the revolutions of the Arab countries had been present for decades;The massive dissemination made possible through the Internet, in an irregular, not programmed, but effective way, gave rise to how the place of technology should be thought at this time;As always, organizations, among them, governments, who do not adapt, tend not to last.
Democracy is a system of government that in the western world is both praised and criticized to a great extent. Some may argue that the techniques used (and necessary!) of the political matches to win elections require an effort, an economic cost so high that it is not justified;Why not spend that money on matters of greater social need? The dilemma is clear;but;A politically correct idea does not solve a problematic;The economy of countries is much more complex than ‘money spent on it’ could be for ‘that’ ’. There are magnitudes, considerations, criteria;The functioning of a government, such as that of any important organization is not correct to assimilate it to a family economy. If poverty will end up spending money;I would have disappeared decades ago.
So what can be expected of the future? How do political systems evolve? Does technology influence? ;The story shows that to have a vision for the future, special care must always be taken with, in the first place the ideas that are popular today, and that, tomorrow they can cease to be;Secondly;The generation of people who today have power positions will not be the same in a decade or two. It is very easy to see how the fact that, in general, the political class that decisions isThe minds of people with power. This does not mean that a ruler should not be a teenager, someone not formed, or without critic;Of course not, power carries a responsibility that carries a job and wear that is full time. Not all citizens would be willing at that cost.
In conclusion, beyond all the advantages and disadvantages of the functioning of the modern world, we can say that in short, the way in which our political, social and economic systems evolve follow the nature of the human being and, in particular, the way of relatingwhat’s wrong with it;where ideas, and their way of spreading and spreading play a fundamental role. Democracy in particular is a system that makes this fundamental characteristic of people have a remarkable relevance in the processes of the modern world;Technology will change the dynamics in which these processes are carried out but not their form.
Leave feedback