The meaning of the truth, the subject-object relationship
The following trial will talk about “the truth”, in which we must mention that it cannot be determined exactly to a specific meaning, since this is a proposition that contains different meanings depending on the vision and experiences lived that we canmention, that is, it cannot be determined with a simple concept that is the truth, what can be done is to approach the path of what we know, or have an approach to what is actually the truth.
The concept of truth is one of the great philosophical problems that still give a lot to speak, in what can be considered as a main theme in terms of religion, a key piece in any political discourse, and like everything in life. But as we know the concept of truth can be inferred with several meanings but it is not necessary for sure what is the truth, that is why we count on what can we understand by truth? It is a question that perhaps, many times it has gone through people’s minds and it is difficultbut that in reality it is not that the reason is fully.
The truth is understood as concordance that exists between what is said, think, believe what "is". It is simply the truth, what cannot be doubted, as well as covers values such as honesty, sincerity and frankness. Likewise, the truth refers to the real and effective existence of something, that is, to reality, to the concrete existence of things, so it is also called as a preposition that it cannot be rationally refuted, that is,The truth is the opposite of falsehood, to lies;As in another term it is cataloged as fidelity to an idea, to the conviction of justice and absolute certainty. However, speaking in philosophical terms, the truth always implies a relationship between a subject, that is, an intelligence and an object, or also a reality as such, the truth is the concordance of thought as real. This is why over time much of philosophers and thinkers have tried to define it, according to Socrates (399 to.c) “It has a non -human origin, the truth proceeds to man, being of a rational objective nature and to find the truth it is necessary to assume the ignorance in which it has been lived in relation to it. I just know that nothing said Socrates ".
For Plato, the world in which we live is nothing more than an imperfect reflection of a suprasensible world, of the "ideas", where the truth is an ideal to achieve with beauty and good. For this, our soul (which does not belong to this world, but that of ideas) should only "remember" what was another moment of its existence. And for Aristotle the truth "is the union of different things, falsehood and truth, do not occur in things (as if the good were true and the bad, immediately false) but in thought". (Aristotle, Metaphysics, 1997). Santo Tomas de Aquino refers that the truth was the intelligibility of being and the correspondence of the mind with reality. And Kant, that really, was a logical perfection of knowledge. Man has the freedom to reach the truth by his own means, according to the use of reason. That is, there is no absolute truth, no one, but that individual who wants to know or know something. For this reason it could be considered that the truth is subjective, allows all people to have different perceptions on the same matter.
Each human being has the ability to reach the truth, and this is achieved if it is available to obtain it. It is necessary to put the mind into operation and use reason;Even so, it will always be conditioned, either to a thought, to actions, to reality, that is, what is real for a person, is not precisely real for others. Everything is in each being, in what he thinks, what he does, and even what he does not do. In religious matters, since every religion is a carrier of truth, especially those who are transcendent for man. The meaning of life, where we come from and where we are going, are answers that every religion grants and are pointed out under the term of truth. The truth is for man what he believes, although from a different point of view and not so much from the full use of reason but rather from faith, the truth can also be defined as “things as they are, as they wereAnd how they must be ". That is, the divine, the spiritual to give a different idea enters, if it is believed in it, the knowledge of God is enough to know the truth. Since the individual goes on to believe without seeing things;In this case, where explanation is found only by the power of a supreme being to which it is confident to be the one that responds to the doubts that can be had;In other words, God’s knowledge will be essential to find light and truth. To this we can also refer in scientific terms, and that is that the truth is seen as a fact that science generates multiple knowledge and that is an undeniable fact, science seeks truth and for me the truth is a description of the independent reality of the independent reality of theobserver, but throughout the explanation of scientific thinking it has been found that you can be far from the true concept of truth.
While it is raised in a nearby definition, that the truth comes from the opposite of the lie and that in turn the lie is not so simple to conceptualize giving that it depends on a context. The truth is, it depends on the perspective of the observer, on the context, however, the most important thing here is to understand that it is the context: set of circumstances and conditions that surround and determine an idea, a theory, a preposition or a concept. Thus, the truths depend on their frame of reference or context.
We can conclude, rectifying that the truth is the concordance of thought with reality, the agreement of the object with itself, in a subject-object reciprocal relationship, true that marks the guidelines of scientific knowledge that is framed by the same knowledge already existing in thereality, as well as knowledge can be used through faith, in having confidence in a supreme being that gives us answers to our doubts.
Leave feedback