Studying How Shared Knowledge Affects Our Trust

0 / 5. 0

Studying how shared knowledge affects our trust

“Shared knowledge often changes over time, does this fact decrease our trust in current shared knowledge?"

"The truth is what remains after applying the time passing exam" Albert Einstein.

The more time the shared knowledge resists the process of changes over time, the more confidence acquires, since it means that no certain statements are found to refute this approach. To this Einstein refers when he mentions that after an examination of the passage of time the truth is what remains. Therefore, the individual’s confidence is consolidated in a better way. However, shared knowledge can lose goodbye, if with the passage of time the results become wrong. So that some historical changes have proven to be crucial when altering certain specific aspects to give a new course to the degree of confidence of the cognitive subject. In biology, for example, Darwin’s theory of evolution changed forever so that living beings should be conceived. In this way, scientific time is one of the most struggling forces when developing the confidence of the cognitive subject in shared knowledge.

Throughout time, natural sciences have mostly characterized themselves by the accuracy of the methods used in the various experimental procedures, as a result really significant contributions have been made to scientific knowledge, however, in the process various controversies have also emergedAround how exact are some of the methods used in the production of new scientific knowledge. Based on this we could question ourselves, to what extent the accuracy of the methods determines confidence in current shared knowledge? At the same time, we can show that not only natural sciences are prone to changes. Indigenous knowledge systems, for example, are not except for the changing factor especially with processes that directly affect the effectiveness of socio-cultural practices, as a result they disturb the confidence that the individual may have towards knowledge. Therefore it is pertinent to question us, to what extent the effectiveness of socio-cultural practices determine the confidence in the current shared knowledge of indigenous populations?

To begin, when establishing a cause-effect relationship between the changes of knowledge and confidence of the cognitive subject, the latter does not always remain constant because knowledge is subject to various changes over time, some of them developed withgreater accuracy;The latter being a factor by which the individual’s confidence increases.

At present, the degree of reliability towards scientific knowledge has increased, since the passage of time has allowed a series of technological advances that lead to the development of more sophisticated methods intended for various experimental processes. As a result, really significant changes have been produced with greater efficacy, achieving precise and reliable results. In this way it has been demonstrated that technology allows significant changes in scientific knowledge to occur. Consequently, scientific knowledge throughout history has become more accurate, due to its change using more sophisticated methods achieving greater reliability by individuals. This is notoriously evidenced when American scientists denied the theory that humans only use ten percent of the brain, based on the connections between 200 regions of this organ in constant update, published the journal Scientific. With the advance of the technologies used in neuroscience. On the other hand, in the observations of the brain through magnetic resonance, it was found that no area remains inactive, even while sleeping. As observed, we can show that with the use of more sophisticated methods, much more precise data is obtained from relatively complex study objects, in the same way there is greater accuracy in the results obtained, which makes the most objective and reliable knowledge. In this way, over time these best justified research replaces the possible defective conclusions raised above, consequently increase their veracity and confidence of the cognitive subject towards current current scientific knowledge. In that sense, the passage of time allows technological advances that lead to the improvement of various methodologies aimed at being applied in experimental procedures. Likewise, they contribute to obtaining more accurate results that are then corroborated and if they are accepted as valid they can generate changes in existing theories, in this way the results can become the new shared knowledge, a much more consolidated and better justified knowledge.

However, it is necessary to mention that the passage of time is not always synonymous with progress or accuracy in the methods used by natural sciences, such is the case of scientific calculations, these sometimes have to conclude certain erroneous results. Consequently, the value of the methods decreases when they negatively affect the production of knowledge and trust that individual has towards current shared knowledge.

Under this approach, scientific calculations do not always allow to achieve accuracy in scientific knowledge, which is disturbing the confidence of the knowledge actor regarding the veracity of the knowledge produced. A clear example, are the conclusions that the Earth is very young to which Lord Kelvin arrived, thanks to the advances in geology and physical that took place in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, today we know that the earth has approximately 4.500 million years. But first there were other attempts to determine this data, and in the absence of information, the use of wrong -term non -sophisticated calculations, I take scientists based on incomplete data, which led them to erroneous conclusions. In this way Kelvin based his final calculations on the idea that our planet was born as a large liquid and hot ball that had gradually cool. In a way that tried to determine how long it would have led him to reach his current temperature, in this way, Kelvin tried to use the temperature of the earth to calculate his age, but the calculations used in this process turned out to be inaccurate. Based on the above, we see that the calculations used in the natural sciences do not always turn out to be exact because there may be various factors that limit the accuracy of the results, for example, the complexity of the object of study, the limit of the methods used and evenEmotion, since in matters of science and accuracy, it can be misleading, since it usually causes scientists to obviate those evidence that contract their results.In this way, results are concluded with a certain degree of uncertainty, which directly influences the confidence of the individual, since distrust is mostly generated when a doubt has arisen about some aspect (the calculations) that demonstrates that this knowledge isIncorrect, the time being a factor determined so that this happens. Therefore, the calculations used during scientific investigation are not always reliable and exact to generate changes in shared knowledge. Consequently, this can generate that the production of knowledge is wrong and decreases the degree of reliability of the individual towards current shared knowledge in this area.

In summary, with the passage of time specifically in the natural sciences, the methods used in scientific experiments have been strengthened since with the construction of a series of much more sophisticated technological tools, the accuracy of the results obtained have increased, on the other hand thisIt is not always successful because there are other methods such as the calculations that on certain occasions turn out to be somewhat inaccurate either because of the complexity of the object of study in which they are used or for how limited the same method is, leading to obtaining resultserroneous. Consequently, the methods used within the natural sciences turn out to be an important factor for the trust that the individual may have towards current scientific knowledge, since when much more sophisticated methods are used, current conclusions are much more reliable for individuals,while when there is a certain degree of inefficiency in the methods used, the confidence of individuals towards scientific knowledge tends to decrease.

Secondly, within indigenous knowledge systems, the progress of various social phenomena such as globalization, have come to produce substantial changes that alter the confidence of individuals towards their socio-cultural practices. In this sense, trust decreases, because new knowledge is generated controversies and doubts within these communities, since this process is sometimes demonstrated by the inefficiency of any of their socio-cultural practices significantly affecting the confidence of individuals withinAn indigenous community.

Under this approach, globalization as a process of acquiring new knowledge in an indigenous community bursts socio-cultural practices, consequently the confidence of individuals towards current indigenous knowledge decreases progressively. At present, traditions and customs play an important role because it is the means by which cultural knowledge is transmitted from generation to generation, so that the entry of a globalization process is important for the acquisition of new knowledge. However, this produces that the community members themselves come to distrust their knowledge used above and describe it as incorrect or lacking of meaning. Therefore, the emergence of new concerns and doubts about any of their beliefs grows rapidly by significantly decreasing their confidence in the knowledge that they so far managed. This is notoriously evidence. At present, these populations prefer to use agroindustrial techniques than to continue using the stars as a tool through which they made their crops, so that they have lost their indigenous essence, I mentioned. In this case, the trust placed in their former socio-cultural practices decreased significantly, which is why they ceased to be used, even were replaced by other brought product of globalization. Therefore, the passage of time leads to the ancestral knowledge of these communities to be lost and are never recovered, product of the constant globalization. Therefore, this circumstance makes confidence in new knowledge progressively decreases. This implies that while time passes there are more and more cultures that distrust the ancestral shared knowledge, thus resulting in danger of extinction due to the same fact that a different knowledge is built from the original, since confidence in former worldviews will be lost than with theUse of technology after globalization are false illogical.

On the other hand, oral traditions are a method by which cultural knowledge is transferred by playing a fundamental role in the preservation of socio-cultural practices, since it allows fighting against social phenomena such as globalization. Since these practices give truth to the knowledge transmitted over time implying greater confidence on the part of the cognitive subject. In this way, socio-cultural practices are an element determined in the conservation of indigenous knowledge. Because being transmitted by the bosses of these communities, considered as a symbol, experience and intelligence, generates an irrefutable confidence by the cognitive subject. A clear example, is the Konya tribe at the end of Canada over the centuries through language, has managed to transmit agricultural techniques that adapt to extreme environments, such as the great heights of the Andes. These socio-cultural practices put at the time test, stop the erosion of the soil and avoid flooded fields. This means that indigenous peoples have built systems that are appropriate for the increasingly intense meteorological phenomena and temperature changes that climate change entails. In fact, they have been transmitted from generation to generation have generated great results today because with these systems they have been helping the rest of humanity to expand its limited food base by increasing trust not only in the indigenous community but also in populationsclose to her. In this way, the confidence of the individual increases, since oral and written traditions turn out to be an expression of a deep worldview thereThe humanity. Consequently, they are a very important factor in the confidence of the worldview that has been contained over time in an indigenous community establishing a greater degree of confidence in current knowledge, since its constant change has achieved May reliability byof individuals.

In summary, the history of indigenous knowledge systems has been constructive and sometimes destructive, since phenomena such as globalization has resulted in trust in the effectiveness of their socio-cultural practices. However, through oral traditions, knowledge has been preserved and transferred constitutes an important resource for all humanity.

In conclusion, the trust for current shared knowledge can decrease, if the results are being wrong or certain scientific statements that refute a previously raised, being an important factor, the inaccuracy of some methods used in objects are madeof complex study, such as calculations within the area of natural sciences or the development of processes such as globalization within the framework of indigenous knowledge that are generating controversies and doubts within these communities, since this process is sometimes demonstratedof some of its socio-cultural practices. However, time also means synonym for progress and accuracy in the methods used by natural sciences, since the development of much more sophisticated methods allows to produce really significant changes with greater efficacy, achieving precise and reliable results in the scientific community, inconsequence scientific knowledge throughout history has become more accurate. On the other hand, through oral traditions, really effective socio-cultural practices have been transmitted because they have been transmitted from generation to generation have generated great results today since they have resulted in the rest of humanity by increasing confidence not only in theindigenous community but also in populations near the same.

For all the reasons mentioned above, I can affirm that I partially agree with the proposed title, since the generated changes do not always affect the individual’s confidence towards current shared knowledge, but also consolidate this knowledge and sometimes generate much more advancessignificant, therefore increase the beginning of the cognitive subject towards current shared knowledge.

References

  • Alchin. N & Henly. C. (2015). Theory of knowledge. Spain. Vicens Vives
  • Dombrowski. E, Rotenmberg. L & Bick. M. (2015). Theory of knowledge. United Kingdom. Oxford University
  • Spray, b. (2014). Science is also wrong: ten errors of brilliant minds. Recovered from: https: // www.The confidential.com/technology/2014-05-28/la-science-tambien-se-equivoca-diez-large-errors-moods bright_136968/
  • Cubadebate. (2016). Scientists deny theory about use of ten percent of the human brain. Recovered from: http: // www.Cubadebate.Cu/Noticias/2016/08/08/Scientific-Desmienc.XTVFRPJKIV
  • FAO. (2017). 6 ways in which indigenous peoples help the world achieve #Hambrecero. Recovered from: http: // www.FAO.org/zhc/detail-events/es/c/1028079/
  • Alejos, José. (2006).Mayan identity and globalization. Recovered from: http: // www.Scielo.org.MX/Scielo.PHP?script = sci_arttext & pid = s0185-257420060002003
  • THE TELEGRAPH. (2015). Ancestral knowledge: what is known and feels always. Recovered from: https: // www.the Telegraph.com.EC/news/good/1/knowledge-anc
  • Albert Einstein – Vital Habits. (2010).Vital habits. Retrieved 5 May 2016, from http: // www.VIITAL HABITS.com/2010/05/06/6-sections-of-the-vida-who-me-desenne-albert-einstein/

Free Studying How Shared Knowledge Affects Our Trust Essay Sample

Related samples

Zika virus: Transmission form Introduction The Zika virus belongs to the Flaviviradae family, was found for the first time in a monkey called Rhesus febrile and in...

Zika virus: cases and prevention Introduction The World Health Organization (WHO) has confirmed that Zika is a virus caused through the mosquito bite which is...

Zeus The King of Greek mythology Introduction Zeus is the Olympic God of heaven and thunder, the king of all other gods and men and, consequently, the main figure...

Zeus's punishment to Prometheus Introduction Prometheus, punished by Zeus Prometheus, punished by Zeus. Prometheus is a ‘cousin’ of Zeus. He is the son of the...

Comments

Leave feedback

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *