Social networks … the security that does not provide us
Since 1997 that social networks have existed, in fact, the first was Sixdigress and its purpose was to connect the user with their contacts. After this in the concept of social networks, different applications have emerged that have allowed us. But the cost of accessing these platforms is our information, this opens the way to the following question, how can you access this information? The answer to this question is very simple and it is due to the misuse that we give to the RRSS, and the misinformation that people have of what it consumes, which in my opinion is very serious since thanks to this they happen many times what It is scams or harassment, among others, which are still violation of privacy. Consequently, the issue goes beyond that and in my opinion what should be implemented is: an education regarding what we use in social networks in addition to introducing a more regulated regulation to what is data privacy.
Although before delving into the subject, we have to be clear about what we call social network. With the help of the LEA (Dictionary of the Legal Spanish) we can define a social network as an Internet service that allows users with common interest or occupations to interact sharing information. What we can extract is that one can control the information he shares and that in the background social networks are communities, although this becomes more than the above explained, however, it is necessary to leave these clear concepts before to continue.
In 2016, Donald Trump was elected as president.
Cambridge Analytica was a company specialized in the collection and analysis of data for the creation of advertising and political campaigns or thus defined. It was closed in 2018.
Facebook is a massive social network launched in 2004 by Mark Zuckerberg and I say massive because according to Ourworldindata.Org recorded at the beginning of 2020 that had about 2.38 billion users.
The previous paragraphs seem to have no relationship, or at least for those who do not remember the scandal that caused an analysis by The New York Times and The Observer of London towards Cambridge Analytica with the theft of data made to Facebook, to influence voters To choose their candidates with greater emphasis on Trump’s choice, but now contextualized, we can denote that not only there was a failure on the part of the service (although clearly Facebook should protect our data), but also users and what they They announce.
Moreover, to give a share of responsibility: “Therefore, the Zuckerberg company says that its safety was never violated:‘ Users gave their information; There was no infiltration in the systems and there was no theft of passwords or sensitive information, ”said a spokesman.”(BBC Mundo, 2018) that is,, and insisting with the previous idea, the background they obtain is because we allow it since there is no effective regulation.
In short, as there have been many cases throughout the history of the Internet, but the transcendental that compromises these communication services with the medium is that users are the one who gives them the data, without the user a social network would lose their essence, more than that, would cease to be a social network if we remember the previous definition. The consumer being the greatest benefactor of these services there should be a stricter regulation for and with these, which better protects our privacy in the networks in the networks. Arguing my position I add a comment by Claudio Gutiérrez cited in an article by Ana Gabriela Martínez de Beauchef Magazine:
“The philosophy should be that any data that you give us, we commit ourselves to take it back without maintaining anything, without encoding it in proprietary format and without claiming intellectual property rights. As the solid project of Tim Berners-Lee, Turing Prize (the Nobel Prize for Computing), which is based on the predicament: give each user the choice of where to save their data, which people and groups can access them, and what applications use ”
In conclusion, social networks have helped a lot in the area of communication, but this has brought a great cost in what is privacy. If Facebook was previously violated a data analytical company, what will we have left as users without knowledge as such so that our identity is not a consumer good?
The RRSS approach regarding what the information of its users is is wrong in what is protection to the population and without regulation that regulates them as such, only remains in us to protect ourselves from the hazards of the environment.
Free Social Networks … The Security That Does Not Provide Us Essay Sample
Zika virus: Transmission form Introduction The Zika virus belongs to the Flaviviradae family, was found for the first time in a monkey called Rhesus febrile and in...
Zika virus: cases and prevention Introduction The World Health Organization (WHO) has confirmed that Zika is a virus caused through the mosquito bite which is...
Zeus The King of Greek mythology Introduction Zeus is the Olympic God of heaven and thunder, the king of all other gods and men and, consequently, the main figure...
Zeus's punishment to Prometheus Introduction Prometheus, punished by Zeus Prometheus, punished by Zeus. Prometheus is a ‘cousin’ of Zeus. He is the son of the...
Social Networks … The Security That Does Not Provide Us
0 / 5. 0
Social networks … the security that does not provide us
Since 1997 that social networks have existed, in fact, the first was Sixdigress and its purpose was to connect the user with their contacts. After this in the concept of social networks, different applications have emerged that have allowed us. But the cost of accessing these platforms is our information, this opens the way to the following question, how can you access this information? The answer to this question is very simple and it is due to the misuse that we give to the RRSS, and the misinformation that people have of what it consumes, which in my opinion is very serious since thanks to this they happen many times what It is scams or harassment, among others, which are still violation of privacy. Consequently, the issue goes beyond that and in my opinion what should be implemented is: an education regarding what we use in social networks in addition to introducing a more regulated regulation to what is data privacy.
Although before delving into the subject, we have to be clear about what we call social network. With the help of the LEA (Dictionary of the Legal Spanish) we can define a social network as an Internet service that allows users with common interest or occupations to interact sharing information. What we can extract is that one can control the information he shares and that in the background social networks are communities, although this becomes more than the above explained, however, it is necessary to leave these clear concepts before to continue.
In 2016, Donald Trump was elected as president.
Cambridge Analytica was a company specialized in the collection and analysis of data for the creation of advertising and political campaigns or thus defined. It was closed in 2018.
Facebook is a massive social network launched in 2004 by Mark Zuckerberg and I say massive because according to Ourworldindata.Org recorded at the beginning of 2020 that had about 2.38 billion users.
The previous paragraphs seem to have no relationship, or at least for those who do not remember the scandal that caused an analysis by The New York Times and The Observer of London towards Cambridge Analytica with the theft of data made to Facebook, to influence voters To choose their candidates with greater emphasis on Trump’s choice, but now contextualized, we can denote that not only there was a failure on the part of the service (although clearly Facebook should protect our data), but also users and what they They announce.
Moreover, to give a share of responsibility: “Therefore, the Zuckerberg company says that its safety was never violated:‘ Users gave their information; There was no infiltration in the systems and there was no theft of passwords or sensitive information, ”said a spokesman.”(BBC Mundo, 2018) that is,, and insisting with the previous idea, the background they obtain is because we allow it since there is no effective regulation.
In short, as there have been many cases throughout the history of the Internet, but the transcendental that compromises these communication services with the medium is that users are the one who gives them the data, without the user a social network would lose their essence, more than that, would cease to be a social network if we remember the previous definition. The consumer being the greatest benefactor of these services there should be a stricter regulation for and with these, which better protects our privacy in the networks in the networks. Arguing my position I add a comment by Claudio Gutiérrez cited in an article by Ana Gabriela Martínez de Beauchef Magazine:
“The philosophy should be that any data that you give us, we commit ourselves to take it back without maintaining anything, without encoding it in proprietary format and without claiming intellectual property rights. As the solid project of Tim Berners-Lee, Turing Prize (the Nobel Prize for Computing), which is based on the predicament: give each user the choice of where to save their data, which people and groups can access them, and what applications use ”
In conclusion, social networks have helped a lot in the area of communication, but this has brought a great cost in what is privacy. If Facebook was previously violated a data analytical company, what will we have left as users without knowledge as such so that our identity is not a consumer good?
The RRSS approach regarding what the information of its users is is wrong in what is protection to the population and without regulation that regulates them as such, only remains in us to protect ourselves from the hazards of the environment.
Free Social Networks … The Security That Does Not Provide Us Essay Sample
Related samples
Zika virus: Transmission form Introduction The Zika virus belongs to the Flaviviradae family, was found for the first time in a monkey called Rhesus febrile and in...
Zika virus: cases and prevention Introduction The World Health Organization (WHO) has confirmed that Zika is a virus caused through the mosquito bite which is...
Zeus The King of Greek mythology Introduction Zeus is the Olympic God of heaven and thunder, the king of all other gods and men and, consequently, the main figure...
Zeus's punishment to Prometheus Introduction Prometheus, punished by Zeus Prometheus, punished by Zeus. Prometheus is a ‘cousin’ of Zeus. He is the son of the...
Comments