Security benefits and correct food
Introduction
Correct food is the fundamental basis for enjoying a healthy and dignified life, which is directly linked to the right to health, but at present we find certain factors that do not allow the above to be carried out as Many would expect it, reality of more than billions of inhabitants from the United States and other peripheral countries.
The activity of eating for many seems to be one of the human activities that most clearly shows the need for heterogeneous scientific disciplines to participate in the understanding and resolution of the different problems that arise in relation to it. The food becomes the interconnection node between biological, social, psychological and cultural processes. However, in it scientific production does not seem to be a planned intellectual concurrence, where a tacit division of scientific disciplines would not be carried out but rather a juxtaposition of specialized visions.
This crisis can be directly associated with what is socially, in malnutrition, hunger and exclusion, which affect an important part of the world population located primarily in the countries of the South, and in disorders, food diseases, nutritional risks.
Context
The food supply passed through an extensive process such as the progressive integration in the industrial organization of the production, distribution and consumption of food, being part of a system in which the ways of moving the financial sector to consolidate an economy of the “Acquisition ‘(Naredo, 2009). Therefore, the elaboration and consumption of food with agriculture and with the next environment in which it developed to insert itself in a complex system from which the issues are resolved, for whom they occur, as these foods are distributed and consumed.
Many of the times we go to the supermarket or we are going to eat at a near restaurant we have wondered if, are we eating what we really want to eat? Or are products imposing on the market to be consumed? But behind this are the great organizations that from the manipulation of the seeds impose us to eat, we have the clear example of (mosonto).
The power of these multinationals set the sales conditions such as the prices and the same strategies for expanding them. But if we see it from the other points of view, we find it very well positioned in the agricultural and food policies of the peripheral countries, where it is possible to dismant The International Monetary Fund in the 80s to make these countries easier to pay an external debt whose amount has been increased since then. The irreplaceable contemplation of public spending that translates into measures that can range from the reduction of strategic grain reserves to deal with debt, until the decrease in aid to farmers and measures to support agricultural prices, through The dismantling or privatization of public companies in charge of storage, distribution and marketing of agricultural and food products or the reduction of agricultural research spending, while export monocultures are supported (Montagut and Vivas, 2009).
In any market that has a high degree of saturation, the increase in the degree of elaboration or elongation of the food chain, incorporating characteristics and services that increase the possibilities of appropriation of added value, becomes a primary element to preserve or increase the fee market. Permanent innovation, product launch with the character of innovative , etc. This orientation is directed to more complex and sophisticated products, provides a central role to research and technological development, which can also be interpreted in industrial processes and methods, in all innovative transformation processes aimed at better conservation or directed To use non -traditional raw materials giving the use of alternative materials, products for specific purposes, new processes aimed at providing food with new conditions, packaging, and/or packaging, and other ways to improve the way in which they reproduce and consolidate market structures and competition conditions. The innovative effect acts as well as one more variety among entry barriers (Delapierre, 1996), derived from the need for a high level of research and technological development, scales, costs and levels of profitability that favor business concentration, at the same time that stimulate global strategies in the use of resources and markets as a way to achieve optimal returns necessary for expenses. For it in the production of transgenics from biotechnology it has meant a qualitative change in the relationship between nature and society, a jump over biological barriers that separate different species. Thanks to him, the giants of genetic alteration as we have evidenced today, the Monsanto group practically monopolizes the production of transgenic seeds (etc. Group, 2008)-,
For all this, it has been tried. Investing its logic, the forms of organization that it can have, the lifestyle associated with it, is essential to be able to build sustainable ways to conceive and practice food. They have been understanding many groups, associations and social movements, determined to build or rebuild ways of feeding and living that go in our favor, that suppose a reconciliation with ours For greed and power, but these are essential for the maintenance and enrichment of life. To these intentions responded to the proposal of food sovereignty that presented us and that since then has not stopped adding evidence, arguments, efforts and experiences to get other ways to feed us are better and possible.
To start analyzing it can be said that from the technical point of view, food as healthy lifestyle should be taken not only from the comfort of households, but also from the work area. This refers to the fact that the food seen from the work area is important, so important that it has become a scientific tendency, a base of research that corroborates for the good implementation of a work methodology, and if this may sound to the fact that it does not have Nothing to do, but aspects as small as those are those that form a base of a healthy life.
Now from another point of view it can be said that when a healthy life is not taken, there are usually consequences, both serious and mild; This is usually linked in many cases by both economic and social variations, the changes that they have.
Initially one of the most important variations and/or aspects to contemplate are the changes in the food marketing chain since seen of a certain motorcycle if the marketer chain is seen in decline, also the quality and acquisition of the products, which prevents necessary diets or food structures being fully complied with.
Food changes or variations as well as can come from the factor already mentioned above, they can also be seen from the social strata and the economy they handle, which makes a food balance more difficult, also, global food inequality, is another Aspect that designs or deteriorates a healthy life, since not in all parts of the world food, they are of the same quality, much less provide the same nutrients, on the other hand, healthy food life in many cases also is usually seen Affected by gender diets, reference is made to the genre because both men and women, due to the social pressure of maintaining a stereotype, have neglected their diet where diets of great demand are imposed by harming in many cases their physical integrity.
However, it is important to be clear that for the integrity of the body to be in optimal conditions, it is necessary that it is well fed, which will provide both physical and emotional benefits and will allow any person’s lifestyle to be healthy and of a certain enviable motorcycle for those who do not lead their life according to the aforementioned
From another point of view, good food has been seen in our society very hand, with the evolution of man, since along with this different cooking techniques have been created and also of nutrient extraction.
Now seeing it in this way, food has also evolved negatively generating the creation of what is now known as junk food, foods that only increase obesity, are usually scarce foods of nutrients; food whose creation has not only affected the population but also the purchase of food truly necessary for the body.
For the above it is vital to mention that many of these foods (junk food) has been modified and this is usually plastic, which further damages the concept of healthy eating. In this same way you can cover a very important theme and it is the massive influence that the means have to convince people of a food routine, routines that somehow help the body this slender.
Conclusions
The trajectory that has taken in logic and the functioning of the agri -food regime and its consequences, makes known a system that is not trained to meet our food needs, but to meet the expansion and accumulation requirements without limits of the large business organizations that govern The food business.
A system that separates the food from ecology and culture, and that to meet its objectives is disconnected from obligations in relation to the conditions of reproduction of society and life. An agri -food system that to affirm is procure the exclusion of food, knowledge and resources forms and models, and imposes its “integration”, -subordination -, to the corporate global circuits, thus feeding processes of “accumulation by dispossession”. A system that denies autonomy and the ability to act, trying to impose a food model that is neither sustainable nor generalizable.
For all of the above, solving the food crisis to which this system leads us requires thinking and acting as far as what is proposed from within. Investing its logic, its forms of organization, the associated lifestyle, is essential to build sustainable ways to conceive and practice food. They have been understanding many groups, associations and social movements, determined to build or rebuild ways of feeding and living that go in our favor, that suppose a reconciliation with ourselves and with nature, recomposing the connections that, broken by the greed and power, they are essential for the maintenance and enrichment of life. To these intentions he responded to the proposal of food sovereignty that he already presented to us in 1996 via peasant and that since then has not stopped adding arguments, cares and experiences to get other ways to feed us are possible.
References:
- Delgado, m.(2010) The globalized agri -food system: food and social and ecological degradation empires
- Almeida, e; Scholz, v. (2008) Food Sovereignty and Food Security, Chile, Santiago, Chile.
- Diaz, C; Garcia, i.(2014) The sociological look towards food: Critical analysis of research development in the food field
- Sanzs, j. (2008) Contributions of sociology to the study of human nutrition: an emerging scientific perspective in Spain, Spain.
Leave feedback