- Tags:
- Show more
- Pages:
- 15
- Words:
- 4125
Students Name Course Name Date "In the case of vessels on time charter, it is the duty of the charterer to nominate a safe port. This duty is an easy one to comply with". Introduction In the track with the reputable maritime run through, most of the charter party arrangements consist of a provision that the vessel has to be sailing concerning safe harbors. Although this condition mostly applies to the time charter parties, the concept of secure ports is of particular importance and relevance also for the voyage charter party. However, there is an essential difference between time and voyage charter parties in this regard. The commitment to recommend a safe harbor is considered as a warranty under the period charter revelry, while the cruise contract party that has an option of choosing the port from the list of unnamed ports does not imply such warranty automatically. This point was proved in The Evaggelos Th, a case related to the time charter. Mr. Donaldson J established that where the permit is under obligation to specify a particular port, this port no doubt must be safe; this reflects the common understanding of maritime practice and business efficacy. In contrast, Lord Clarke M.R. in The Reborn found that in each particular case, not depending on what type of charter party, an implication of safe port warranty is subject to specific circumstances. Focus to some exemptions; it is essential to place down equally in the voyage and in period charter party provisions or any of their hybrids that the ports and the berth’ of packing and discharging to the safe harbor to which the vessel is designated. Apparently, this responsibility is billed alongside the
Leave feedback