Psychoanalysis and knowledge and experience construction
Introduction
The current psychoanalysis is the result of a knowledge construction and experiences that have been implemented with the passing of time and the contributions of those who have decided to study the psychic phenomena with the function of the unconscious and how this acts according to the reactions. Explanations and interpretation have dynamically influenced the fundamental theory. Based on this argument, it can be established that psychoanalysis is considered a historical science. The literature was therefore an important point in Freud’s analysis, and something that was subject to interpretation, which can currently be found several documents of the psychoanalyst in which he proposes an extensive study of literature. But not only of him, also from other authors such as Bruno Bettelheim who contributes with the meaning of several classic stories giving him another perspective, that of psychoanalysis.
Developing
Among the classic authors are visualized to those who ventured into psychoanalysis, however their theories are based on the development or district approach of psychoanalysis. But, in the same way, revolutionary authors are found that attempted to replace or modify psychoanalysis with the design of new models, treatment and procedure for the channeling of information that provided their studies in the field of neurophysiology and the clinical results of the sessions of the sessionsTherapeutics to issue efficient forecasts. Therefore the Freudian perspective has been developed in different turns, which have been modified in different satisfactory products.
The psychoanalyst is interested in the real or fantasy interaction that had an important place the subject and parents in the first.
Gear and Liendo were the one who chose to study the psychoanalyst from an informative panorama in which he operated with the systematization of information as a means of simplification. This author defended the capacity and scope of technology, and although he went back in years in which ICTs were not booming their mathematical treatment, the premise of the relationship of computer language with psychoanalysis remains an object, it is still an objectresearch. Authors like Gerard S. Klein and Schafer ignored the elements of traditional psychoanalysis and innovated a new theory that was not conceptually based and lacked theory, since it was based on experience or practice, then they connected to psychoanalysis with empiricism in a clinical context that was operated according toexperience support.
The new disciplines have rebuilt the initial theory and have also been more attractive for the study of subjective reality, since they do not stop focusing on a general point that are unconscious intrapsy conflicts. (Antonio Sánchez-Barranco Ruiz P. S.-B., 2005, p. 96-99) establishes that the psychoanalysis of modernity points towards empiricism because the facts can yield those results that are expected for the involvement of analysis of those frustrations or other type of conflict in the individual.
Sigmund Freud was the pioneer of psychoanalysis when he was exercising his psychologist’s profession and dealing with a patient who mostly presented what could be called "mental problems" in which this author always maintained that everything is the result of what was foundIn unconscious of the human being and it was an issue that comes from the behavior of the behavioral. However, Freud also had other interests such as medicine and literature. This second element can be deduced due to the various essays that Freud design and public about relevant works that came from Shakespeare’s pen or Cervantes. The peculiarity of essays is not only due to the topic that develops but how Freud applies knowledge about psychoanalysis and links the theory of human behavior the novels or stories.
Bruno Bettelheim knows that psychology is related to everything, since as expressed previously from the cognitive the behavioral comes so that the stories could not cease to be linked. In Bruno’s work, a symbolic introspection of what is read and seems so banal and childish can be evidenced deeply.
The stories for children, the stories or stories contain a lotIt deserves to be rescued. Both a character and the other has a point where a psychological profile can be designed where allusion is made to traumas and conflict intrinsic to the mind.
(Montoya, pages. 45-50) expresses that stories and psychoanalysis are connected both the use of childrenpsychoanalysis.
conclusion
Through the investigations, several criticisms have been carried out about psychoanalysis where some authors promoted criticism about what it is concluded that they have been based on empiricist budgets in some of the cases is efficient, but in other theories there is delays in theTreatment and application of psychoanalysis. The observation of behavior is essence, but the theoretical field in which relationships between original and replaced objects should be set aside should not be set aside.
Literature and psychoanalysis are an important point to cover, whereby several professionals from different fields are interested in their study as a means of being able to apply in their careers or jobs and facilitate what at first glance can be easy. In the case of psychiatrists who treat all the time with conflicts of that nature or merely the teachers who seek excellent teaching and want leader with those latent conflicts in the minds of students who prevents them from developing.
The stories in the same way contain within their narrative the diagnoses that throw in the psychoanalysis of a normal or usual person, even when it seems that everything is a "fairy tale".
Leave feedback