Knowledge theory essay
Shared knowledge can be understood in many different ways, since you can count on no numbers of factors in various fields of topics to be chosen, since it is grouped into different areas of knowledge, such as seeing shared knowledge is that that does not depend only on the contributions of a person but also a certain group of individuals who want Time Does this fact say our trust in current shared knowledge?.
Analyzing with arguments that give to understand that knowledge does not lose their trust, but every time the time has passed, the context that wanted to be implied by making a distrust of erasing the past of the past has not been lost and presenting a New knowledge in the present, giving examples that help to prove what is said referring to everyday life on the other hand we will deal with the question with two areas of knowledge, which are history and natural sciences, being in the history area studies the facts the facts past thanks to the investigation of a knowledge given by several historians of the past and it turns out that in the present another knowledge about this subject comes out giving distrust in shared knowledge, while in the area of natural sciences it is responsible for experimentation focusing on The search based through a hypothesis in order to find the result we want to obtain.
The knowledge of the past with the passage of time in the future is increasing For experimentation thanks to the various theories that occur every time, since we can see the mind is like a parachute only works if we have it open for that we want to see if the contribution of shared knowledge that scientists give to humanity are losing trust during the passage of time? Following the shared knowledge, it is one that is given by an investigation as we can see the example of Stephen Hawking according to its revolutionary theory that the radiation existed is being a type of radiation that is born on the horizon of events of the black holes.
Given this thanks to another theory before it happened in the past thanks to our best scientist Albert Einstein having different criteria, but, from the perspective of Stephen Hawking from this premise and after so many years of research he found the correct answer the holes the holes the holes Blacks could not lose dough and become smaller and this is where he presents his conclusion quantitative fluctuations in the void that arises as a consequence of the HEISISMberg uncertainty principle saying in this theory that also said that black holes does not exist abolishing what done On Albert Einstein’s theory about the existence of black holes, thus giving the shared knowledge in which the distrust of the theory that resulted in Stephen Hawking’s theory while Albert Einstein showing in his theory of relativity that a hole Black has a surface called the horizon of the events in which I said that they pue them Black ros can take different ways, but these evaporate in the same way, and this is where we can see that the two theories are based on a theory given by a person X, but another person comes and promoting this theory and taking out New views making the knowledge that is made shared loses confidence during the passage of time, since theories are given at various dates that of Albert Einstein in 1780 while Stephen Hawking in 2019.
On the other in the history area it is a science that has a priority to achieve the study of the events of past events or moments that marked a point in the history of humanity using the method of social science being this a framework that study The facts and chronologically narrates the events of the past for that reason we want to see if the shared knowledge changes with the passage time? How does our confidence in shared knowledge decrease? Since there are times that this knowledge history may have increased or omitted crucial information, focusing on an authoritarian leader Adolf Hither before God and the world, the strongest has the right to make his will prevail this being a leader of Germany led the Nationalist Workers Party German with a totalitarian regime, giving here how it was that Hither, being so sadistic he had the opportunity to get to power, giving ideas these in the past thanks to the fact that in the history books that talk about him we can see during the passage of time Hither the ideas that talk about him these ideas have been widely modified causing confidence to be investigated.
He came to power thanks to his way of giving his speeches at the time of giving an emotion, the tables will be altered attempt masses vote for and this dies what reality was Hither his bad side He does not via the public, in the books it is objectively told as we can in the book Mein Kampf this talks about Hither’s life, written in an emotional way.
Since it was written by Adolf Hither, we can see that there are people who see Hither as a repulsive dictator who wanted to end the extermination of people while others cheer on him as a good person who only wanted to do good for his country, since the shared knowledge that has so far given about the most important data happened in the First and Second World War where Hitler participates a paradox in the present that makes people doubt that if Hither was actually a good or bad person , since shared knowledge is decreasing over time thanks to the same theories that arise about it giving themselves a discontent for people there may be confidence in scientists, since these never always experiencing I can be bad, making me make it Everything said has been invalid and make this knowledge lose confidence during the time as the example of Albert Einstein and Steven Hawking that Parti r of the deduction of the theory of another person gives the conclusion of another opening without numbers of theories for the public causing them to doubt these results.
While the story the knowledge given by historians from an investigation this may have lost confidence thanks to the various theories that occur, since when reading a book we can deduce a fact that tells it in one way, but by being able to read another book We can see how they are distorted when writing losing the trust of historians who want to investigate the fact as it is Hither’s example, since this account of their own point of view in an emotional way while other books tells about Another way making the confidence of the given fact be lost
Shared knowledge often changes over time. Does this fact decrease our trust in current shared knowledge? That knowledge every time time passes can see that they can modify each text or paragraph causing them to change or lose confidence in readers, speaking of the two areas of knowledge we see that to lose the confidence of that knowledge thanks to the fact that In the past a theory is given this is taken as a guideline in order to be analyzed in the future.