Immanuel Kant influence on modern philosophy
Introduction.
Immanuel Kant’s thought had a very important role in philosophy during the modern era, questioning and trying to seek the origin and basis of human knowledge, raising whether what we believe real is really. For this, it begins to produce an analysis of the root of certain concepts, especially with morals, reason and imperative. Next we will address more about this exhibitor, what is the categorical imperative and that philosophers coincide with the nature of this.
Developing.
Immanuel Kant uses a concept that no other philosopher of the modern era would have mentioned, this is called a categorical imperative that refers to all the good actions we perform by duty, leaving aside the inclinations that do not lead to perform them for their own interest. This is reflected in the following appointment, it says which possible action thanks to me would be good and represents the practical rule in relation to a will that does not immediately execute an action due to being good. The above clarifies that goodwill comes and is governed by the duty of my actions and this can be applied if we have political freedom in order to flee the double standard.
This is where there are two philosophers that have a strong influence on the ideas raised by Immanuel Kant, and in turn they relate to the categorical imperative and their nature, these are René Descartes and David Hume.
First, René Descartes mentions that reason is the only thing that makes us men and distinguishes us from beasts. In addition, throughout his text "Speeches of the Method" he doubts everything we know and that to get to understand is through reason and leaving aside the feelings, since the latter mentioned would make it difficult for us to distinguishand ensure that it is the truth.
It is in this where Kant coincides, at the time he doubts the human being because he distrusts that he acts selflessly, but in the long run through reason man will act morally when he does it for duty;Like Descartes he doubts absolutely in the ability of the human being, but trusts that through reason can generate that one correctly develops the level of knowledge very much.
Secondly, we have David Hume that coincides with Kant that metaphysics will not lead to knowledge, it is at this time that the experience has a great role and important to achieve knowledge, this is one of the ideas that Hume poses inyour book. Kant after several conclusions says that synthetic judgments come from experience, which is why it could be said that both authors discard metaphysics as science, that will take us to ‘truth’ and that these would be mere belief continent continent.
On the other hand, Hume in one of his texts says, assuming that one of the main foundations of moral praise lies in the usefulness of any quality or action, it becomes evident that reason must contribute significantly in all decisions ofThis gender, in this fragment a Hume position is clearly seen that reason is necessary for the time to make decisions and this is also related because reason is in the long run is linked to the categorical incentive.
conclusion.
In conclusion, Immanuel Kant had a strong influence of two philosophers who helped him focus with different topics such as experience and reason, and through these concepts he wanted to define what is called categorical imperative, which means a morally action is goodWhen it is for duty. Throughout his book one, a very specific question of the categorical imperative can be generated, which is: can we do something for duty and not for any inclination to personal interest?
Leave feedback