Global warming and harm to society
Introduction
Global or also called climate change is also the temperature increase in both atmosphere and oceans belonging to planet Earth that is producing serious damage to society and projecting a non -pleasant future for future generations. Climate change is the exaggerated increase in greenhouse gases that make life possible on our planet Earth, also as we see today to better explain this concept is how temperature levels are changing rapidly just like many species in floraAnd our country’s fauna are in danger of extension, as we also see the problems that all living beings have regarding the increase in UV radiations that are harmful to almost any type of human life.
Developing
At present we see how global warming or climate change is harming society, because the times we see now are no longer the same as it has been before, since the level of gas effect issued is not regularly or in a formNatural is more produced and accelerated by the human beings that we inhabit on the planet, in addition the products that we elaborate as aerosols, soot and the same variation of the Earth. Some of these problems according to Summit Peoples (2017) affirms: This is one of the most important causes that knows how to explain the appearance of global warming with the progress of the years;And it has to do explicitly with industrial activities through factories that emanate constant fumes in their work zone as part of energy sources, but which deteriorates the natural environment. In the same way Eco Awareness (2010) tells us: greenhouse gases act similarly to the glass ceiling of a greenhouse, catching heat and overheating the planet. The increase in temperatures leads to climate change that includes effects such as sea level increase, changes in precipitation models that produce floods and droughts, and the dissemination of diseases transmitted by vectors such as malaria.
But one of the authors who tell us objectively about global warming is James Lovelock (2015) where he tells us: ‘The greatest danger to which humanity has faced so far’. Strong words that do not just assimilate our heads. Global warming is still considered by some as a mere alarmism or something not proven. Far from this, global warming is a reality that has been tested by scientific methods, which can be measured, and on which we can make terrible deductions for the future.
Nowadays our political, scientific authorities and the defenders of the environment have plans and methods that make it possible for climate change and some of these are: some recommendations, above all, tell us, this means that we haveto stop burn fossil fuels and start using solar energy, wind and other renewable energy sources while ensuring the southern countries of the southern development possibilities. If we do so, the earth will leave part of the carbon out of the atmosphere cyclically and we will end up returning to the safe limit. By decreasing the use of other fossil fuels and improving agricultural and forestry practices worldwide, we could return to 350 for the middle of the century. As conventions were also created, according to Wikipedia (2019), he made a political discussion on the policies on global warming together with a great team of researchers where they mention this: most countries are members of the United Nations Framework Convention on theClimate change (CMNUCC). The ultimate goal of the Convention is to prevent dangerous human interference in the climate system. As declared in the Convention, this requires that GHG concentrations stabilize in the atmosphere at a level in which ecosystems can naturally adapt to climate change, food production is not threatened and economic development can continue from aSustainable way. The Framework Convention was agreed in 1992, but since then global emissions have increased.null
During the negotiations, the 77 group (a lobbying group in the United Nations that represents 133 nations in development): 4 pressed for a mandate that required developed countries "[take] the initiative" in reducing theiremissions. This was justified on the basis that: the emissions of the developed world have contributed more to the accumulation of GHG in the atmosphere, per capita emissions were still relatively low in developing countries and the emissions of developing countries would grow to satisfyYour development needs.
This mandate was based on the Kyoto protocol of the Framework Convention, which entered into force in 2005.When ratifying the Kyoto protocol, the most developed countries accepted legally binding commitments to limit their emissions. These first round commitments won in 2012.US President George W. Bush rejected the treaty based on "exempting 80% of the world, including the main population centers, such as China and India, of compliance and would cause serious damage to the United States economy".null
In the XV Conference on Climate Change of the UN, held in 2009 in Copenhagen, several CMNUCC members made the Copenhagen agreement. The members associated with the Agreement (140 countries, in November 2010) aspire to limit the future increase in the global average temperature below 2 ° C. The XVI Conference (COP 16) was held in Cancun in 2010. Produced an agreement, not a binding treaty, where the parties must take urgent measures to reduce GHG emissions to meet the objective of limiting global heating to 2 ° C on pre -industrial temperatures. It also recognized the need to consider the strengthening of the goal to an increase in the global average of 1.5 ° C.
As we see there are many people who defend this serious problem, but there are people who are also in favor of it and recently or nothing about this problem, if gentlemen is a problem and a very important one regarding humanity.
One of those against is the capitalist system that weighs and signing in the conventions as well as the COP does not meet the conditions it presents, since it continues to emit large greenhouse gases, producing contaminated products, chemical fertilizers among other problemsthat harms us everyone.
conclusion
In conclusion, we see that global warming or climate change is one of the big problems we are going through today and we have to take measures in this regard, measures that if they really work today. Dear friends if we do not change that right now, that is, if the change is not in our way of living, thinking to do the different things we will have a serious but very serious problem in the not too distant future. The change is in each of us, because a small gesture how to recycle or reuse things would be a great cabio for humanity.
Bibliographic references
- Jamet, s. and j. CORFEE-MORLOT (2009). ASSESSING THE IMPACTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE: A LITERATIRE REVIEW. National Geographic Editorial. Retrieved on December 15, 2019 from: https: // www.National Geographic.is/half-environment/que-is-the-gland-global.
- Lean, Judith L.;Wang, and. M.;Sheeley, n. R. (2002). The Effect of Increaseing Solar Activity On The Sun’s Total and Open Magnetic Flux During Multiple Cycles: Implications for Solar Forcing of Climate. Geophysical Research Letters (in English) 29 (24): 2224. Retrieved on March 21, 2017 from: https: // es.Wikipedia.org/wiki/warm -global#discusi%c3%b3n_pol%c3%.
- Richard, p. (2017). Global warming: which is, causes, consequences and solutions. Editorial Cumbres y Pueblos. Recovered from https: // summit.Org/half-environment/warm-global/
- Choi, Ooneck;Fisher, Ann (2005). The Impacts of Socioeconomic Development and Climate Change on Severe Weather Catastrophe Losses: Mid-Atlantic Region (Mar) and the U.S ». Climate Change (in English) 58 (1-2): 149-170. Recovered from https: // www.CEC.Uchile.CL/~ MIVALENC/DEFINITION.htm.
- Urrego, l. AND., Alexander Correa-Metrio, Catalina González-Arango, (2018). Colombian Caribbean Mangrove Dynamics: Anthropogenic and Environmental Drivers. Bulletin of the Mexican Geological Society, 133. Remote dehttps: // www.Consciousness.com/2010/08/21/Que-are-the-Global-Global.
Leave feedback