Animal Rights Myth Or Reality?.

0 / 5. 0

Animal rights myth or reality?.

Introduction

On the planet Earth we are multiples beings that we cohabit it and for reasons of evolution and natural adaptation the specimen known as human was the one who predominates the food chain by the greatest gift that any species possesses that it is thought and reasoning.

Now, with this gift the human being has created its peoples, which later became great cities, to invent their transport, first models of use of animal force such as carriages already later evolved with the use of natural resources such as wood or oil, and finally its way of feeding.

All this step of adaptation and evolution caused other species to be evicted from their natural habitat and forced to see consumption and others as a member who fosters security and friendship.

Like everything in life there are excesses, one of them and the most tangible for thinking is that of power, this same ends that if one has power it is conducive to do and undo what he wants with it, affecting Anything that gets in its way to achieve it, whether of the same species or others that are lower for their view, or are simply less valuable.

The abuse is frowned upon by any person, media lynchings are carried out when an individual or a woman is seen and they are crossed out of uncultured and little graceful knowledge that performs these acts, but a peculiar situation happens, when this happens with An animal is of the species that is does not shock or transcend more than when it does with a person.

This is where one of the longest debates of the twentieth and twenty -first century, the rights of animals, those who are not protected who should protect them, such as helping being equitable for our colleagues on our planet, with what criteria would seek to judge a person When he performs the abuse of his strength with a helpless living or lacking being, which is so ruin to think of a person to feel superior to another living being, these thoughts are in discussion for years, but with the passing of them he has There was a notorious change to safeguard our animal friends.

Some humans go to the extreme of defense of animals by causing vandalism in order to save the latter from the jaws of other humans, so how to know when is equal rights between humans and species.

Developing

There are animals rights, which causes them to be protected from the injustices that man can cause him, these are very variants in each country, this can be given aware of culture, a noticeable example, while in part of India the bull or cow is venerated as a God, in Spain the same animal is used for the cultural activity of bullfighting, another aspect is food this same equally variant in each country. However, objective of these rights are aimed at giving more peaceful death to animals, which are not abused in the use of them in an activity or under the shelter of a family when the animal is adopted.

In Mexico, pets and farm animals are considered as a property, this means, which is a luxury acquisition as if it were a car, a house, an appliance, etc. This means that if the person’s situation is economically compromised with some banking or personal loan where an embargo commitment was signed, animals can be seized, this is apparently poorly implemented since a natural life is being used as a Value artifact.

When the law is not fulfilled to the people who cause such mistreatment, they can be different in relation to the economic, fines for breaking animal rights around 1 to 9 years in prison according to the Criminal Code, of course it is worth mentioning that in Our country the sanctions change according to the state where it happens, of the 32 states that make up our country only two do not have a regime of animal protection laws which are: Oaxaca and the State of Mexico, but having modifications within its Criminal Code that have semblance with the other states.

A philosophy of applying these penalties due to animal abuse has an increase in social welfare, that is, since by identifying and channeling individuals who are violent and damage the integrity of an animal, they prevent their brutality and violent ideology humans, this can be said that people who tend to hurt animals are a high possibility that damage or kill people.

The latter can be accepted as true, many serial murderers have an animal abuse past, as if they practiced with them to graduate with a person, in relation to the penalty is favorable, since you can work the person’s psyche with The purpose of avoiding greater damage to society where it lives.

Throughout the world there are groups and associations that carry the rights of animals, you are mostly non -profit, they aim to safeguard the habitat of animals, give them a better life, help avoid the extinction of species, including Other tasks, their work is noble and with people who act will have a better global society.

On some occasions, these institutions have radical groups that damage infrastructure of companies dedicated to food, make boycots on fashion catwalks where there will be the use of animal skins, fight against fishing boats in the seas, etc. This causes a counterproductive ideology, by the meaning, that society negatively cloges these attitudes and reassains them unnecessary or exaggerated, the same causes that instead of more people join the struggle for equality, choose to ignore them and failing to contribute more to the negative.

In low -development countries, they will seek to have the human being first before any other species, and although strong and raw it is normal, since any living being seeks first to meet their needs before worrying about others, and the basic needs of the It has any animal species, which they are, satisfying hunger and drinking and it is almost certain is an animal is hungry and sees the possibility of attacking a person ara without thinking, this needs is primitive in every living being.

So the fight continues in many countries, it is an issue that is neglected to solve other problems, but not forgotten, without the animals we would not have the livelihood that society requires and can continue to have a better quality giving a better life to the species that contribute to this food chain.

We can provide an optimal life to animals, give them a deserved space and a dignified life and in turn death also, without suffering, without causing them much pain, they have diseases like us, help them when they are required without going to humanize the animals.

Each species is important for the ecosystem, we must look for that optimal balance without abusing our obvious advantages, and thinking about a utopian ideology that does not the actions of a person reflect those of others and that each species is equal and similar to each other, Only with their qualities that represent them with notoriety in the ecosystem.

conclusion

In conclusion, three personal views with respect to the subject, the first one, I am aware that the human being drastically abuses every living being and ecosystem, was given by the effect of evolution the reasoning that we clearly do not use in an adequate and inclusive way The same animals sometimes do not demonstrate it with actions of greater efficacy than a being that is supposed to think, we focus on only us and that we are fulfilled shortly what we want in all aspects, homes, food, drink, etc. This causes animals to be raised in mass and abusive and with disproportion We would respect as a society in aspects such as health in the first place.

As a second point of view, the relationship of animals and culture is a very sensitive line, I am aware that culture is something that represents a nation and is very beautiful but in some aspects it touches animals and is understood as fun, in Spain Bullfighters were represented as heroes in past times now became murderers, when in reality it was their profession that for years sought to entertain the guild in the ring, instead Mexico was the battles of roosters, which in nature happens only that It was considered a sport at certain times, now illegal in most states, it is a sport that supports its coach economy with the physical damage of animals, but in the end culture is variant and depends on the view with which you look and understand.

Finally, something that I do not like that people do is the humanization of their pets, they are animals and should be treated as such, we are different beings and with different needs, on many occasions this proceeds to make animals have complex of personality or even they are damaged more performing these actions than helping.

The animals are great companions in our lives, it is in each of us to take care.

References

  • Anonymous. (2011). Serial killers who began abusing animals. 11/27/2019, from San Francisco de Asis Website Animal: https: // sasfapr.WordPress.com/2011/09/25/murderers-in-series-who-you-abusing-of-the-animals/
  • Contreras Paulina. (2018). Are there animal protection laws in Mexico?. 11/28/2019, from GD Legal Website: https: // www.NAFTA-LOW.com/2018/06/hayyes-of-protection-animal-en-mexico/
  • Anonymous. (2011). ANIMAL RIGHTS. 11/28/2019, Deisidrio Website: http: // www.Deisidro.com/animals/animal_right.htm

Free Animal Rights Myth Or Reality?. Essay Sample

Related samples

Zika virus: Transmission form Introduction The Zika virus belongs to the Flaviviradae family, was found for the first time in a monkey called Rhesus febrile and in...

Zika virus: cases and prevention Introduction The World Health Organization (WHO) has confirmed that Zika is a virus caused through the mosquito bite which is...

Zeus The King of Greek mythology Introduction Zeus is the Olympic God of heaven and thunder, the king of all other gods and men and, consequently, the main figure...

Zeus's punishment to Prometheus Introduction Prometheus, punished by Zeus Prometheus, punished by Zeus. Prometheus is a ‘cousin’ of Zeus. He is the son of the...

Comments

Leave feedback

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *