Analysis And Summary Of The Franz Kafka Process

0 / 5. 0

Analysis and summary of the Franz Kafka process

Introduction

A young ambitious and mundane bank official named K. He is arrested by two guardians a good morning, although he has not done anything wrong. K. is outraged and outraged. The morning is that of his thirtieth birthday. A year later, on the morning of his thirtieth birthday, two guards come again for K. They take him to a quarry outside the city and kill him on behalf of the law. K. The process is the chronicle of that intermediate year of the case of K., their struggles and encounters with the invisible law and the untouchable court. It is a story, ultimately, state -induced self-destruction.

About Franz Kafka’s process

Joseph k. He is ambitious, successful, demanding, curta, a businessman without nonsense. It is arrogant, calculator, intolerant of its perceived inferiors, and yet (at least in the greatest matter of guilt, innocence and civil freedom) on the right. Typical protagonist of Kafka, achieves the difficult and separate balances of complexity and unreality, sympathy and aversion. But what is guilty? What would your arrest and prosecution justify (not to mention persecution)? Apparently nothing. As the novel points out, the court that has claimed it is completely vile. However, no one is free of guilt. Tempted how everything is going to be laugh. In part this is because he calculates that it is imprudent to show his hand, or force that of his opponents, but also because there is a persistent question in his mind of if in some way, in some way, he has been negligent. Is its inherent apolitical nature? He has always assumed law, order and justice. They have been a stable and invisible framework in which it has achieved its success, without having to pay them to consider them.

He is not a man who contemplates the greatest questions. Is this inability to ‘think outside the box’, its susceptibility to machine machinations on whose path has been launched, the basis of its eventual and inevitable guilt? K -experience. With the Guardians and the Inspector marks the guideline for their various meetings with representatives of the law. Most are friendly enough with him, if not always decent. Almost everyone beats him with his smallness. They are officials, robots, very down in the totem, following orders and fulfilling duty without understanding or trying to understand the underlying reason. The Court is impeccable;The law is your own justification and the only one you need.

The interrogation scene is clearly surreal. The location itself is unreal: the last floor of a house, in the back room of a poor family. To this we must add the masses muttering, the applause, the uproar and the stony silences, the beards and the badges, the secret signs, the grooves and the outburst more evidently of K. Are they going through? Is your aggression a useful tactic? Does your behavior matter? This is an alternative world of anonymous courts where k. Do not know the rules of commitment. Your initiation is not a good omen. However, he continues to think that it is better not to take the case too seriously.

Throughout the book, the Court is associated with moisture, dust, stagnant, suffocation;K. He repeatedly suffers from the lack of fresh air. Here we have the first indications of this. In the streets, in the halls and stairs of this poor neighborhood there is life and vitality. K. He fixes them well. At the time he enters the court meeting room, K. feel that the air is ‘too thick for him’ and comes out again. Later k. Try to make faces in the gallery through ‘Darkness, dust and stinky.’Yes k. He is not physically ill from the atmosphere (as will be in successive chapters), his judgment and faculties seem added, which perhaps explains the quality of the scene of the scene.

According to the disarticulation of the narrative, the laundering woman, about nothing, is launched to K. And then disappear from the novel. Apparently it establishes the pattern of behavior for young women of working class when they are in the presence of K. (Lenin will act similarly, and the lawyer will later give an explanation of his actions). It also achieves, indirectly, induce K. To ascend to legal offices, and perhaps this is its purpose. K calculations. of the sexual conquest (as a power tool against the magistrate and therefore the Court) leads to its first defeat admitted in this mental chess match in which he sees himself and the court committed. His second defeat must then be his weakness in law firms.

Rancio and suffocating air is once again the distinctive seal of the Court and all its actions. While in the interrogation the atmosphere may have affected K K., In the offices it is physically incapacitated. He is speechless and helpless, totally at the mercy of the court. How far this association comes? Is the court like the bad air in a closed room? The two seem ineffably linked;Maybe they are interchangeable. Like the air, the Court seems to be everywhere, invisible, insidious, known for its effects. There is a slight parallel between the final scene of this chapter and chapter ten that must be pointed out. In both cases, K. is scared by court officials who hold it for weapons. In this chapter, K. request the escort and support. In the last chapter, K. cannot escape him.

The action and narrative direction of chapter four are never really resumed in this unfinished novel. Frailelan Bursstner reappears ephemesely in the final chapter, but the sub -border of the persecution of K. And his reluctance never concretizes. It is true that many characters in the process appear brief and quickly disappear, like so many figures that evaporate in a dream landscape. But one feels that ultimate. Captain’s suspicions and Frailean Montag do not seem to be related to the case of K., nor k. It seems to link both in any way to their legal difficulties. None of these characters have anything to do with the rest of the book.

This incident seems orchestrated precisely to facilitate an eventual mental break, whose signs many of the defendants seem to exhibit. It is one thing to have the case to worry about, but another is to be signed with the fault of being, involuntarily, the source of the misery of these poor fools. Those who see the process as an omen of totalitarian atrocity indicate that this chapter evokes the interrogation-tattura (and it is not always the questioned who is tortured) and the psychological oppression that have been the visit cards of a depressing number of regimes of the centuryXX. Apparently, the Court has access to all places (you can establish a store in the closet of a company, or in a housing attic), but still carries out its business in dark, sealed, uncomfortable, improvised or outsideThe door (like the examples that have just been given). This is surely not coincidence;Rather, it is an essential characteristic of an impenetrable and inexplicable bureaucracy.

Chapter five maintains the relationship between K., The court and air. After witnessing the whips, and realizing that he cannot prevent it, K. He approached a window and opens it, as if the fresh air dissipates the presence of the court.

Lenin is the third woman who loves Joseph K. Who are the women of the process? Ladies, secretaries and poor housewives, all accustomed to interpreting, or desire to interpret, the role of a lover. Kafka’s biographer describes the prior praga to World War I as a place where young professionals -a banker like K., A lawyer or bureaucrat like Kafka- would marry women in their class, but usually approached poorer women of a lower social class for sex. Prostitution was not, for some women, as clearly defined as a profession: the lines between lover, lover, free and professional were not so strictly drawn. Certainly, this reflects the relative impotence (economic, social, political) of low women on the social scale. Young men did not complain, and perhaps the young women with whom they were formed obtained more from the treatment of what was otherwise at their disposal within the strictly prescribed limits of their social world. The modalities of the time and the place tacitly approved of the agreement.

That said, Lenin seems to worship K. Beyond any reason or promise of potential benefit. K. He himself has no idea why he has suddenly become so attractive, but it is conceited enough to not bother too much about it. Even so, for someone so ambitious at work, and so determined not to give the court any control over it, K. sometimes acts quite reckless. The first case was his insolence during the interrogation. And now, it rejects the chief secretary of the Court. Such, apparently, are Lenin’s charms. Or such is the underdeveloped sense of gravity of K. At this point in your case.

Chapter seven puts k. In a loss of information, all of which does not reach anything. Or, rather, all of which leads to simple conclusions: the Court of Justice is inscrutable and irremediably corrupt. Both the lawyer and the painter would make K believe. that the only thing that really matters are good relations with subordinate officials. However, this is the case just because nobody knows who the senior officials are. They are unattainable, so naturally all whistling, pleas and influences that sell pass through the lower courts. However, as the painter makes clear, what is at stake is low. No one can really influence the result of the case, at most they can play with the trajectory, to drag the process indefinitely while the guilt mantle looms on the accused.

Delayed justice, of course, is justice denied. But justice can not be expected. Ultimately, the Court is corrupt not due to the pathetic influence that occurs in its lower levels. It is corrupt because it is not responsible to the society to which it serves. Perhaps the law is internally consistent, but those outside their ranks and to whom it applies will never know. Complaints are never revealed;The evidence is never revealed;The final judiciary is invisible;The word of the law is only available for those who judge the accused. Who can defend himself when he does not know the accusation? Who can defend himself when he does not know the law? Defense is clearly bad view. The defendant is generally considered guilty.

In general, it is believed that the trial is, among other things, a condemnation of the intractable austrohungary bureaucracy, which Kafka, encloses how it was in the state insurance establishment, knew well. If the book offers a recent portrait of manipulative and unfair regimes that would begin to dominate Europe and Asia a decade after the author’s death, it is not because the author offers a specific prophecy. However, describes the seed: a society that accepts an irresponsible government in the name of the need, which considers the law as a divine law because it refuses to show.

Block is another informant arranged on the actions of the Court, as well as another stranger who knows a good amount about the situation of K. He is five years after his case and looks like a shell of a man. It is physically described as ‘drying’;Psychologically he has completely subjugated the lawyer. Who also clandestinely consults five hacking lawyers behind the back of the lawyer makes him much crazier and more pathetic. Is this the future life that k. You have to wait? Is this the type of freedom that the painter affirms that he can help K. to win? K. Analyze the behavior of block (and its treatment at the hands of Huld and Lenin) with that of a dog. In fact, when Lenin catches geniudo block, worrying about the carpet, she grabs him through his neck as one could behave a domestic pet that behaves badly. Block, once a respected merchant has been reduced to the kennel.

Kafka’s parable from the entrance to the law is as bright as opaque. It seems to contain some essence of truth about the relationship between the citizen and the law, or perhaps the human condition in general, but what-part of the tragedy of the useless efforts of a man- does it really relate? It is a miniature kafka story: a genomic genesis of endless comments and speculation. The chaplain offers K. The contours of several prominent interpretations, but is clearly only scratching the surface.

Is the man in the country aimed at representing K.? Is the law really unattainable? Does the goalkeeper tell the truth? He is the goalkeeper, through his connection with the law, beyond reproach. K. He comments that considering the impeccable goalkeeper is accepting everything he says as the truth despite the fact that at least one of his statements is false. Perhaps the most prominent comment of the chaplain comes in his response: ‘… It is not necessary to accept everything as true, you just have to accept it as necessary’. This seems to be the modus operandi of the law, the dynamo within the large court of the court, the divine principle before which the officials (and eventually the defendants) are prostrated. It is, as K declares., A ‘melancholic thought’ because ‘converts the lie initially universal’. That universal lie of necessity (the mother of detention) maintains the mechanism advancing and crosses the possible challenges for the system. When the law takes the need as its model, justice is convicted. The terrible fact of the process, and of the parable, is that men who seek justice finally accept this universal deformed principle and their biased criteria;They undergo the need for their own exclusion or death.

The process ends with a complete stop. Emotional and symbolic burden accumulates rapidly through the final pages, culminating in a true thunder. However, more than anywhere else in the book (except, perhaps, the end of chapter eight), one feels sharply that it is an unfinished novel. What has K did. From your meeting with chaplain? We want to know it desperately. Surely, he has fought, explored new roads, considered to leave the city. Was he already so resigned to this ridiculous destination in chapter nine? How do you wait for some kind of official visitor on your birthday? In another order of things, the appearance of Frailean Bursstner reminds us of how completely unsolved that this matter remained, far behind in the first half of the book. 

The process was written during 1914-1915 and then abandoned, for any reason, Kafka went to other projects. It is not completely complete;However, the process is marked by the contradiction of hermetic clarity, of the expression of the ring of truth and internal coherence.

Free Analysis And Summary Of The Franz Kafka Process Essay Sample

Related samples

Zika virus: Transmission form Introduction The Zika virus belongs to the Flaviviradae family, was found for the first time in a monkey called Rhesus febrile and in...

Zika virus: cases and prevention Introduction The World Health Organization (WHO) has confirmed that Zika is a virus caused through the mosquito bite which is...

Zeus The King of Greek mythology Introduction Zeus is the Olympic God of heaven and thunder, the king of all other gods and men and, consequently, the main figure...

Zeus's punishment to Prometheus Introduction Prometheus, punished by Zeus Prometheus, punished by Zeus. Prometheus is a ‘cousin’ of Zeus. He is the son of the...

Comments

Leave feedback

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *